000040207 001__ 40207
000040207 005__ 20210812080355.0
000040207 0247_ $$2DOI$$a10.1111/j.1365-3040.2004.01231.x
000040207 0247_ $$2WOS$$aWOS:000224283000005
000040207 037__ $$aPreJuSER-40207
000040207 041__ $$aENG
000040207 082__ $$a570
000040207 084__ $$2WoS$$aPlant Sciences
000040207 1001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)129388$$aRascher, U.$$b0$$uFZJ
000040207 245__ $$aFunctional diversity of photosynthesis during drought in a model tropical rainforest - the contributions of leaf area, photosynthetic electron transport and stomatal conductance to reduction in net ecosystem carbon exchange
000040207 260__ $$aOxford [u.a.]$$bWiley-Blackwell$$c2004
000040207 300__ $$a1239 - 1256
000040207 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article
000040207 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
000040207 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
000040207 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
000040207 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
000040207 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
000040207 440_0 $$04976$$aPlant, Cell and Environment$$v27$$x0140-7791$$y10
000040207 500__ $$aRecord converted from VDB: 12.11.2012
000040207 520__ $$aThe tropical rainforest mesocosm within the Biosphere 2 Laboratory, a model system of some 110 species developed over 12 years under controlled environmental conditions, has been subjected to a series of comparable drought experiments during 2000–2002. In each study, the mesocosm was subjected to a 4–6 week drought, with well-defined rainfall events before and after the treatment. Ecosystem CO2 uptake rate (Aeco) declined 32% in response to the drought, with changes occurring within days and being reversible within weeks, even though the deeper soil layers did not become significantly drier and leaf-level water status of most large trees was not greatly affected. The reduced Aeco during the drought reflected both morphological and physiological responses. It is estimated that the drought-induced 32% reduction of Aeco has three principal components: (1) leaf fall increased two-fold whereas leaf expansion growth of some canopy dominants declined to 60%, leading to a 10% decrease in foliage coverage of the canopy. This might be the main reason for the persistent reduction of Aeco after rewatering. (2) The maximum photosynthetic electron transport rate at high light intensities in remaining leaves was reduced to 71% for three of the four species measured, even though no chronic photo-inhibition occurred. (3) Stomata closed, leading to a reduced ecosystem water conductance to water vapour (33% of pre-drought values), which not only reduced ecosystem carbon uptake rate, but may also have implications for water and energy budgets of tropical ecosystems. Additionally, individual rainforest trees responded differently, expressing different levels of stress and stress avoiding mechanisms. This functional diversity renders the individual response heterogeneous and has fundamental implications to scale leaf level responses to ecosystem dynamics.
000040207 536__ $$0G:(DE-Juel1)FUEK257$$2G:(DE-HGF)$$aChemie und Dynamik der Geo-Biosphäre$$cU01$$x0
000040207 588__ $$aDataset connected to Web of Science, Pubmed
000040207 65320 $$2Author$$achlorophyll fluorescence
000040207 65320 $$2Author$$adrought
000040207 65320 $$2Author$$aleaf area
000040207 65320 $$2Author$$aleaf fall
000040207 65320 $$2Author$$aleaf growth
000040207 65320 $$2Author$$anet ecosystem CO2 exchange
000040207 65320 $$2Author$$aphotosynthesis
000040207 65320 $$2Author$$aphotosynthetic electron transport
000040207 65320 $$2Author$$atropical rainforest
000040207 65320 $$2Author$$atropical trees
000040207 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aBobich, E. G.$$b1
000040207 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aLin, G. H.$$b2
000040207 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)VDB2595$$aWalter, A.$$b3$$uFZJ
000040207 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aMorris, T.$$b4
000040207 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aNaumann, M.$$b5
000040207 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aNichol, C. J.$$b6
000040207 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aPierce, D.$$b7
000040207 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aBil, K.$$b8
000040207 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aKudeyarov, V.$$b9
000040207 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aBerry, J. A.$$b10
000040207 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)2020843-1$$a10.1111/j.1365-3040.2004.01231.x$$gVol. 27, p. 1239 - 1256$$p1239 - 1256$$q27<1239 - 1256$$tPlant, cell & environment$$v27$$x0140-7791$$y2004
000040207 8567_ $$uhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2004.01231.x
000040207 909CO $$ooai:juser.fz-juelich.de:40207$$pVDB
000040207 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0010$$aJCR/ISI refereed
000040207 9141_ $$y2004
000040207 9131_ $$0G:(DE-Juel1)FUEK257$$bEnvironment (Umwelt)$$kU01$$lChemie und Dynamik der Geo-Biosphäre$$vChemie und Dynamik der Geo-Biosphäre$$x0
000040207 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)VDB49$$d31.12.2006$$gICG$$kICG-III$$lPhytosphäre$$x0
000040207 970__ $$aVDB:(DE-Juel1)53406
000040207 980__ $$aVDB
000040207 980__ $$aConvertedRecord
000040207 980__ $$ajournal
000040207 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)IBG-2-20101118
000040207 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED
000040207 981__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)IBG-2-20101118
000040207 981__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)ICG-3-20090406