% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Reid:42356,
author = {Reid, J. S. and Koppmann, R. and Eck, T. F. and Eleuterio,
D.},
title = {{A} {R}eview of {B}iomass {B}urning {E}missions {P}art
{II}: {I}ntensive {P}hysical {P}roperties of {B}iomass
{B}urning {P}articles},
journal = {Atmospheric chemistry and physics},
volume = {5},
issn = {1680-7316},
address = {Katlenburg-Lindau},
publisher = {EGU},
reportid = {PreJuSER-42356},
pages = {799 - 825},
year = {2005},
note = {Record converted from VDB: 12.11.2012},
abstract = {The last decade has seen tremendous advances in atmospheric
aerosol particle research that is often performed in the
context of climate and global change science. Biomass
burning, one of the largest sources of accumulation mode
particles globally, has been closely studied for its
radiative, geochemical, and dynamic impacts. These studies
have taken many forms including laboratory burns, in situ
experiments, remote sensing, and modeling. While the
differing perspectives of these studies have ultimately
improved our qualitative understanding of biomass-burning
issues, the varied nature of the work make inter-comparisons
and resolutions of some specific issues difficult. In short,
the literature base has become a milieu of small pieces of
the biomass-burning puzzle. This manuscript, the second part
of four, examines the properties of biomass-burning particle
emissions. Here we review and discuss the literature
concerning the measurement of smoke particle size,
chemistry, thermodynamic properties, and emission factors.
Where appropriate, critiques of measurement techniques are
presented. We show that very large differences in measured
particle properties have appeared in the literature, in
particular with regards to particle carbon budgets. We
investigate emissions uncertainties using scale analyses,
which shows that while emission factors for grass and brush
are relatively well known, very large uncertainties still
exist in emission factors of boreal, temperate and some
tropical forests. Based on an uncertainty analysis of the
community data set of biomass burning measurements, we
present simplified models for particle size and emission
factors. We close this review paper with a discussion of the
community experimental data, point to lapses in the data
set, and prioritize future research topics.},
keywords = {J (WoSType)},
cin = {ICG-II},
ddc = {550},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)VDB48},
pnm = {Chemie und Dynamik der Geo-Biosphäre},
pid = {G:(DE-Juel1)FUEK257},
shelfmark = {Meteorology $\&$ Atmospheric Sciences},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
UT = {WOS:000227615700001},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/42356},
}