001     42719
005     20240709081639.0
024 7 _ |2 DOI
|a 10.1111/j.1600-0889.2004.00095.x
024 7 _ |2 WOS
|a WOS:000220696500005
037 _ _ |a PreJuSER-42719
041 _ _ |a ENG
082 _ _ |a 550
084 _ _ |2 WoS
|a Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences
100 1 _ |0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|a Kerminen, V.-M.
|b 0
245 _ _ |a Dynamics of atmospheric nucleation mode particles: A time scale analysis
260 _ _ |a Oxford [u.a.]
|b Wiley-Blackwell
|c 2004
300 _ _ |a 135 - 146
336 7 _ |0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
|a Journal Article
336 7 _ |2 DataCite
|a Output Types/Journal article
336 7 _ |0 0
|2 EndNote
|a Journal Article
336 7 _ |2 BibTeX
|a ARTICLE
336 7 _ |2 ORCID
|a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
336 7 _ |2 DRIVER
|a article
440 _ 0 |0 7861
|a Tellus B
|v 56
|x 0280-6509
500 _ _ |a Record converted from VDB: 12.11.2012
520 _ _ |a A theoretical framework was constructed by which one can estimate the relative role of different processes in thedynamics of atmospheric nucleation mode particles. The framework relies on 14 timescales that describe (1) changes inthe total nuclei number concentration, (2) changes in the mean diameter of the nucleation mode and (3) concentrationsof low-volatile vapours responsible for the growth of nuclei. The magnitude of the derived timescales can be calculatedrelatively easily from the available measurement or modelling data. Application to the lower-troposphere revealed thatunder most conditions removal of nuclei is dominated by their coagulation with larger background particles and thatthis process competes very strongly with growth of nuclei to sizes relevant to atmospheric chemistry and physics.Withsome exceptions, self-coagulation of nuclei was shown to be of marginal importance compared with their growth bycondensation and their removal by coagulation. Finally, by comparing predictions based on relevant timescales withthose obtained from detailed numerical simulations, quantitative criteria were derived concerning (1) when one mayneglect self-coagulation of nuclei when looking at nucleation mode dynamics and (2) when the whole nucleation modecan be neglected because of its eventual removal. These criteria are extremely useful for atmospheric modellers whoneed to simplify their models as much as possible. From the modelling point of view, other processes requiring furtherattention are the introduction of new nuclei into the system and decrease in nuclei number concentration due to dilutionof the air.
536 _ _ |0 G:(DE-Juel1)FUEK257
|2 G:(DE-HGF)
|a Chemie und Dynamik der Geo-Biosphäre
|c U01
|x 0
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to Web of Science, Pubmed
700 1 _ |0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|a Lehtinen, K. E. J.
|b 1
700 1 _ |0 P:(DE-Juel1)VDB45939
|a Anttila, T.
|b 2
|u FZJ
700 1 _ |0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|a Kulmala, M.
|b 3
773 _ _ |0 PERI:(DE-600)2026992-4
|a 10.1111/j.1600-0889.2004.00095.x
|g Vol. 56, p. 135 - 146
|p 135 - 146
|q 56<135 - 146
|t Tellus / B
|v 56
|x 0280-6509
|y 2004
856 7 _ |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0889.2004.00095.x
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:42719
|p VDB
913 1 _ |0 G:(DE-Juel1)FUEK257
|b Environment (Umwelt)
|k U01
|l Chemie und Dynamik der Geo-Biosphäre
|v Chemie und Dynamik der Geo-Biosphäre
|x 0
914 1 _ |y 2004
915 _ _ |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0010
|a JCR/ISI refereed
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)VDB48
|d 31.12.2006
|g ICG
|k ICG-II
|l Troposphäre
|x 0
970 _ _ |a VDB:(DE-Juel1)59667
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a ConvertedRecord
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-8-20101013
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED
981 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)ICE-3-20101013
981 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-8-20101013


LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21