% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Pieruschka:42750,
author = {Pieruschka, R. and Schurr, U. and Jahnke, S.},
title = {{L}ateral gas diffusion inside leaves},
journal = {The journal of experimental botany},
volume = {56},
issn = {0022-0957},
address = {Oxford},
publisher = {Univ. Press},
reportid = {PreJuSER-42750},
pages = {857 - 864},
year = {2005},
note = {Record converted from VDB: 12.11.2012},
abstract = {Diffusion of CO2 inside leaves is generally regarded to be
from the substomatal cavities to the assimilating tissues,
i.e. in the vertical direction of the leaf blades. However,
lateral gas diffusion within intercellular air spaces may be
much more effective than hitherto considered. In a previous
work it was demonstrated that, when 'clamp-on' leaf chambers
are used, leaf internal 'CO2 leakage' beyond the leaf
chamber gaskets may seriously affect gas exchange
measurement. This effect has been used in the present paper
to quantify gas conductance (g(leaf,l), mmol m(-2) s(-1)) in
the lateral directions within leaves and significant
differences between homo- and heterobaric leaves were
observed. For the homobaric leaves, lateral gas conductance
measured over a distance of 6 or 8 mm (the widths of the
chamber gaskets) was $2-20\%$ of vertical conductance taken
from published data measured over much smaller distances of
108-280 microm (the thickness of the leaves). The specific
internal gas diffusion properties of the leaves have been
characterized by gas conductivities (g*(leaf), micromol
m(-1) s(-1)). Gas conductivities in the lateral directions
of heterobaric leaves were found to be small but not zero.
In homobaric leaves, they were between 67 and 209 micromol
m(-1) s(-1) and thus even larger than those in the vertical
direction of the leaf blades (between 15 and 78 micromol
m(-1) s(-1)). The potential implications for
experimentalists performing gas exchange measurements are
discussed.},
keywords = {Carbon Dioxide: physiology / Diffusion / Phaseolus:
physiology / Photosynthesis: physiology / Plant Leaves:
physiology / Plant Transpiration: physiology / Soybeans:
physiology / Time Factors / Tobacco: physiology / Vicia
faba: physiology / Carbon Dioxide (NLM Chemicals) / J
(WoSType)},
cin = {ICG-III},
ddc = {580},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)VDB49},
pnm = {Chemie und Dynamik der Geo-Biosphäre},
pid = {G:(DE-Juel1)FUEK257},
shelfmark = {Plant Sciences},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:15668225},
UT = {WOS:000227565100009},
doi = {10.1093/jxb/eri072},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/42750},
}