001     43064
005     20180210125929.0
024 7 _ |2 DOI
|a 10.1016/j.theochem.2004.10.027
024 7 _ |2 WOS
|a WOS:000226393300029
037 _ _ |a PreJuSER-43064
041 _ _ |a eng
082 _ _ |a 540
084 _ _ |2 WoS
|a Chemistry, Physical
100 1 _ |a Koglin, E.
|b 0
|u FZJ
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)VDB793
245 _ _ |a Evaluation of ab initio methods for the calculation of 13C NMR shifts of metabolites of methabenzthiaruzon
260 _ _ |a New York, NY [u.a.]
|b Elsevier
|c 2004
300 _ _ |a
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
440 _ 0 |a Journal of Molecular Structure - Theochem
|x 0166-1280
|0 13145
|y 1
|v 712
500 _ _ |a Record converted from VDB: 12.11.2012
520 _ _ |a We have evaluated quantum chemical methods for the calculation of C-13 NMR chemical shifts in 2-aminobenzothiazole (ABT), 2-(methylamino)benzothiazole (MABT) and the reaction product from ABT with benzoic acid, important species in a variety of applications. While using the BLYP DFT method, the GIAO and CSGT methods to compute chemical shifts performed very similar for all three molecules, whereas the LORG methods seem to lead to a discrepancy. PW91 performs similarly, while MP2 leads to unsatisfactory results. The empirical ACD program yields very good absolute values for the NMR shifts compared to the ab initio calculated results, but gives a significant error for one of the carbons in the adduct studied. As a consequence, the well-performing quantum methods are preferred for unambiguous and correct assignment. (C) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
536 _ _ |a Chemie und Dynamik der Geo-Biosphäre
|c U01
|2 G:(DE-HGF)
|0 G:(DE-Juel1)FUEK257
|x 0
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to Web of Science
650 _ 7 |a J
|2 WoSType
653 2 0 |2 Author
|a NMR
653 2 0 |2 Author
|a C-13
653 2 0 |2 Author
|a aminobenzthiazole
653 2 0 |2 Author
|a computational chemistry
653 2 0 |2 Author
|a ab initio
653 2 0 |2 Author
|a ACD
653 2 0 |2 Author
|a GIAO
700 1 _ |a Witte, E. G.
|b 1
|u FZJ
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)VDB2348
700 1 _ |a Willbold, S.
|b 2
|u FZJ
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)133857
700 1 _ |a Meier, R. J.
|b 3
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
773 _ _ |a 10.1016/j.theochem.2004.10.027
|g Vol. 712
|q 712
|0 PERI:(DE-600)1491514-5
|t Journal of molecular structure / Theochem
|v 712
|y 2004
|x 0166-1280
856 7 _ |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.theochem.2004.10.027
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:43064
|p VDB
913 1 _ |k U01
|v Chemie und Dynamik der Geo-Biosphäre
|l Chemie und Dynamik der Geo-Biosphäre
|b Environment (Umwelt)
|0 G:(DE-Juel1)FUEK257
|x 0
914 1 _ |y 2004
915 _ _ |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0010
|a JCR/ISI refereed
920 1 _ |k ZCH
|l Zentralabteilung für Chemische Analysen
|g ZCH
|0 I:(DE-Juel1)ZCH-20090406
|x 0
920 1 _ |k ICG-IV
|l Agrosphäre
|d 31.12.2006
|g ICG
|0 I:(DE-Juel1)VDB50
|x 1
970 _ _ |a VDB:(DE-Juel1)60228
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a ConvertedRecord
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)ZEA-3-20090406
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED
981 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)ZEA-3-20090406
981 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118
981 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)ZCH-20090406


LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21