000044669 001__ 44669
000044669 005__ 20240712101040.0
000044669 0247_ $$2DOI$$a10.1029/2001JD000866
000044669 0247_ $$2WOS$$aWOS:000182897800001
000044669 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a0141-8637
000044669 0247_ $$2Handle$$a2128/20496
000044669 037__ $$aPreJuSER-44669
000044669 041__ $$aeng
000044669 082__ $$a550
000044669 084__ $$2WoS$$aMeteorology & Atmospheric Sciences
000044669 1001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)VDB808$$aKonrad, S.$$b0$$uFZJ
000044669 245__ $$aHydrocarbon measurements at Pabstthum during the BERLIOZ campaign and modeling of free radicals
000044669 260__ $$aWashington, DC$$bUnion$$c2003
000044669 300__ $$aD4
000044669 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article
000044669 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
000044669 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
000044669 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
000044669 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
000044669 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
000044669 440_0 $$06393$$aJournal of Geophysical Research D: Atmospheres$$v108$$x0148-0227
000044669 500__ $$aRecord converted from VDB: 12.11.2012
000044669 520__ $$aThe Photochemistry Experiment in BERLIOZ (PHOEBE) was conducted in July/August 1998 at a rural site located near the small village Pabstthum, about 50 km NW of downtown Berlin. More than 60 nonmethane hydrocarbons (NMHC) in the range of C-2-C-10 were measured using two in situ gas chromatography (GC) systems. The first (GC1) was capable of measuring C-2-C-10 hydrocarbons with a relatively high separation efficiency but low time resolution (80-90 min), while GC2 provided quasi-continuous measurements of C-5-C-10 hydrocarbons with a time resolution of 20 min but with a poorer separation efficiency than GC1. The advantages of both systems were joined by interpolation between two data points of GC1 with the pattern given by GC2. For compounds that could not be reliably measured with GC2, patterns of compounds with similar reactivity were used. Air masses with the lowest photochemical age as estimated from the toluene/benzene ratio and the highest hydrocarbon mixing ratios were observed on 20 and 21 July when air was advected from the direction of Berlin. Alkanes were the most abundant hydrocarbons (similar to60%) on a molecular basis, followed by alkenes and aromatics. The reactivity of the hydrocarbons toward OH was dominated by the alkenes (>60%), with isoprene and a-pinene constituting the major part. The hydrocarbon data were used together with the other trace gases measured at Pabstthum to simulate OH, HO2, and RO2 concentrations with the condensed chemical box model RACM. Relatively good agreement of the simulated radical concentrations with the spectroscopic measurements made at Pabstthum is observed for NOx mixing ratios >5 ppb, whereas the model overestimates OH and HO2 by 100% and 40%, respectively, at low NOx. The discrepancy between measured and modeled OH does not correlate with the concentration of particles. The RO2 concentrations are in good agreement with the measurements over the entire range of NOx. Sensitivity studies show that peroxyacetyl nitrate ( PAN) is an important radical source and that missing volatile organic compound (VOC) reactivity is an unlikely explanation for the overestimation of HOx: By doubling of the VOC reactivity, OH and HO2 can be brought into agreement. However, the model then overestimates the organic RO2 concentrations by almost a factor of 2. Another important finding is that RACM overestimates the measured NO/NO2 ratio by 25%. This and the overestimation of HO2 lead to an overprediction of the local ozone formation rate by about 40% at low NOx mixing ratios.
000044669 536__ $$0G:(DE-Juel1)FUEK257$$2G:(DE-HGF)$$aChemie und Dynamik der Geo-Biosphäre$$cU01$$x0
000044669 588__ $$aDataset connected to Web of Science
000044669 650_7 $$2WoSType$$aJ
000044669 65320 $$2Author$$ahydrocarbons
000044669 65320 $$2Author$$agas chromatography
000044669 65320 $$2Author$$afree radicals
000044669 65320 $$2Author$$afield measurements
000044669 65320 $$2Author$$achemical mechanism
000044669 65320 $$2Author$$amodeling
000044669 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)VDB1445$$aSchmitz, T.$$b1$$uFZJ
000044669 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)129185$$aBuers, H.-J.$$b2$$uFZJ
000044669 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)129209$$aHouben, N.$$b3$$uFZJ
000044669 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)VDB1007$$aMannschreck, K.$$b4$$uFZJ
000044669 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)VDB1063$$aMihelcic, D.$$b5$$uFZJ
000044669 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)3588$$aMüsgen, P.$$b6$$uFZJ
000044669 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)16214$$aPätz, H.-W.$$b7$$uFZJ
000044669 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)16342$$aHolland, F.$$b8$$uFZJ
000044669 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)16326$$aHofzumahaus, A.$$b9$$uFZJ
000044669 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)VDB1396$$aSchäfer, H.-J.$$b10$$uFZJ
000044669 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)16212$$aSchröder, S.$$b11$$uFZJ
000044669 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)6742$$aVolz-Thomas, A.$$b12$$uFZJ
000044669 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aBächmann, K.$$b13
000044669 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aSchlomski, S.$$b14
000044669 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aMoortgat, G.$$b15
000044669 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aGrossmann, D.$$b16
000044669 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)2016800-7 $$a10.1029/2001JD000866$$gVol. 108, p. D4$$pD4$$q108<D4$$tJournal of geophysical research / Atmospheres  $$tJournal of Geophysical Research$$v108$$x0148-0227$$y2003
000044669 8567_ $$uhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2001JD000866
000044669 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/44669/files/2001JD000866.pdf$$yOpenAccess
000044669 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/44669/files/2001JD000866.pdf?subformat=pdfa$$xpdfa$$yOpenAccess
000044669 909CO $$ooai:juser.fz-juelich.de:44669$$pdnbdelivery$$pdriver$$pVDB$$popen_access$$popenaire
000044669 9131_ $$0G:(DE-Juel1)FUEK257$$bEnvironment (Umwelt)$$kU01$$lChemie und Dynamik der Geo-Biosphäre$$vChemie und Dynamik der Geo-Biosphäre$$x0
000044669 9141_ $$y2003
000044669 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0150$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bWeb of Science Core Collection
000044669 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0100$$2StatID$$aJCR
000044669 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0111$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index Expanded
000044669 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0510$$2StatID$$aOpenAccess
000044669 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0010$$2StatID$$aJCR/ISI refereed
000044669 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0030$$2StatID$$aPeer review
000044669 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0199$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bThomson Reuters Master Journal List
000044669 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)VDB48$$d31.12.2006$$gICG$$kICG-II$$lTroposphäre$$x0
000044669 970__ $$aVDB:(DE-Juel1)6543
000044669 9801_ $$aFullTexts
000044669 980__ $$aVDB
000044669 980__ $$aConvertedRecord
000044669 980__ $$ajournal
000044669 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)IEK-8-20101013
000044669 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED
000044669 981__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)ICE-3-20101013
000044669 981__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)IEK-8-20101013