000046201 001__ 46201
000046201 005__ 20210625102950.0
000046201 0247_ $$2Handle$$a2128/490
000046201 0247_ $$2URI$$a490
000046201 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a1433-5530
000046201 020__ $$a3-89336-402-1
000046201 037__ $$aPreJuSER-46201
000046201 041__ $$aEnglish
000046201 082__ $$a333.7
000046201 1001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)VDB17057$$aWeihermüller, Lutz$$b0$$eCorresponding author$$gmale$$uFZJ
000046201 245__ $$aComparison of different soil water extraction systems for the prognoses of solute transport at the field scale using numerical simulations, field and lysimeter experiments
000046201 260__ $$aJülich$$bForschungszentrum Jülich GmbH Zentralbibliothek, Verlag$$c2005
000046201 300__ $$aXXII, 145 S.
000046201 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)11$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aDissertation / PhD Thesis
000046201 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)3$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aBook
000046201 3367_ $$02$$2EndNote$$aThesis
000046201 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$adoctoralThesis
000046201 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aPHDTHESIS
000046201 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Dissertation
000046201 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aDISSERTATION
000046201 4900_ $$0PERI:(DE-600)2414988-3$$821545$$aSchriften des Forschungszentrums Jülich. Reihe Umwelt / Environment$$v55
000046201 502__ $$aUniversität Bonn, Diss., 2005$$bDr. (Univ.)$$cUniversität Bonn$$d2005
000046201 500__ $$aRecord converted from VDB: 12.11.2012
000046201 520__ $$aSampling of water and solutes in soils is of major importance to understand water movement and solute transport in soils and to validate mathematical models. Porous cups are widely used to extract soil water for monitoring solute transport. However, it is not yet clear how the suction cup influences the matrix potential in the surrounding soil and which part of the soil is sampled. This research was designed to numerically evaluate the activity domain, the extraction domain and sampling area of a suction cup under constant infiltration. A finite element model (HYDRUS-2D) was used to simulate the effect of various applied suctions at two infiltration rates on the water status in three soils (clay loam, sandy clay and sandy soil). Particle tracking was used to track the streamlines which define the sampling area and extraction domain of the suction cup. In general, the activity domain, the extraction domain and sampling area of the suction cup depend primarily on the soil hydraulic parameters and the upper boundary, and secondarily on the applied suction. The results showed that the activity domain, the extraction domain and the sampling area are largest for highest ambient hydraulic conductivities. The activity domain and the sampling area also decrease with increasing infiltration rates. Further, the extraction domain of the suction cup depends strongly on the duration of water extraction. Soil heterogeneity seems to play a minor role with respect to the activity domain and sampling area of the cup, but a major role in the amount of extracted water and solute breakthrough. In a second step, a lysimeter and field experiment equipped with porous ceramic plates, tensiometers, TDR-probes and suction cups was conducted over a 427 day period to evaluate differences in soil water sampling and solute transport for a conservative tracer and the test compounds Methabenzthiazuron (MBT) and Ethidimuron (ETD). In general, the two lysimeters at the lysimeter station at the $\textit{Forschungszentrum Jülich}$ showed comparable leaching behaviour over time, reflected by the tensiometer, TDR and drainage measurements. In comparison to the lysimeters the sampling pits at the test site Merzenhausen indicate lower water contents and amounts of extracted water over the whole sampling period. These differences can be traced back to variability in the climatic data (e.g. precipitation and evaporation) caused by microclimatic distinctions at the two locations. The results of the field and lysimeter experiments show that no complete tracer breakthrough could be determined at a depth of 120 cm for the sampling pits and the lysimeters as a consequence of the short sampling time and the dry summer in 2003. As a result of retardation the breakthrough of the test substances MBT and ETD is not complete even for the samplers at 40 cm depth. Therefore, bromide breakthrough at 120 cm depth and MBT/ETD breakthrough for 40 and 120 cm depth were just described in qualitative terms. The variability in bromide tracer breakthrough at 40 cm depth for the different samplers at the two locations is reflected in the variability of the mean pore water velocity, $\nu$, and dispersivity, $\lambda$. On the other hand, no transport parameters could be determined for the pesticide breakthrough at all locations. In general, larger ETD recoveries were measured compared to the MBT for all samplers, whereby high peak concentrations in the samplers can be traced back to single events. The differences in the amount of extracted water, bromide masses, and as a result variability in transport [...]
000046201 536__ $$0G:(DE-Juel1)FUEK257$$2G:(DE-HGF)$$aChemie und Dynamik der Geo-Biosphäre$$cU01$$x0
000046201 655_7 $$aHochschulschrift$$xDissertation (Univ.)
000046201 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/46201/files/Umwelt_55.pdf$$yOpenAccess
000046201 909CO $$ooai:juser.fz-juelich.de:46201$$pdnbdelivery$$pVDB$$pdriver$$popen_access$$popenaire
000046201 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0510$$2StatID$$aOpenAccess
000046201 9141_ $$y2005
000046201 9131_ $$0G:(DE-Juel1)FUEK257$$bEnvironment (Umwelt)$$kU01$$lChemie und Dynamik der Geo-Biosphäre$$vChemie und Dynamik der Geo-Biosphäre$$x0
000046201 920__ $$lyes
000046201 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)VDB50$$d31.12.2006$$gICG$$kICG-IV$$lAgrosphäre$$x0
000046201 970__ $$aVDB:(DE-Juel1)72508
000046201 980__ $$aVDB
000046201 980__ $$aJUWEL
000046201 980__ $$aConvertedRecord
000046201 980__ $$aphd
000046201 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118
000046201 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED
000046201 980__ $$aFullTexts
000046201 9801_ $$aFullTexts
000046201 981__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118