% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{SandovalSoto:49559,
      author       = {Sandoval-Soto, J. S. K. and Stanimirov, M. and von Hobe, M.
                      and Schmitt, V. and Valdes, J. and Wild, A. and Kesselmeier,
                      J.},
      title        = {{G}lobal uptake of carbonyl sulfide ({COS}) by terrestrial
                      vegetation: {E}stimates corrected by deposition velocities
                      normalized to the uptake of carbon dioxide ({CO}2)},
      journal      = {Biogeosciences},
      volume       = {2},
      issn         = {1726-4170},
      address      = {Katlenburg-Lindau [u.a.]},
      publisher    = {Copernicus},
      reportid     = {PreJuSER-49559},
      pages        = {125 - 132},
      year         = {2005},
      note         = {Record converted from VDB: 12.11.2012},
      abstract     = {COS uptake by trees, as observed under dark/light changes
                      and under application of the plant hormone abscisic acid,
                      exhibited a strong correlation with the CO2 assimilation
                      rate and the stomatal conductance. As the uptake of COS
                      occurred exclusively through the stomata we compared
                      experimentally derived and re-evaluated deposition
                      velocities (V-d; related to stomatal conductance) for COS
                      and CO2. We show that Vd of COS is generally significantly
                      larger than that of CO2. We therefore introduced this
                      attribute into a new global estimate of COS fluxes into
                      vegetation. The new global estimate of the COS uptake based
                      on available net primary productivity data (NPP) ranges
                      between 0.69-1.40 Tg a(-1). However, as a COS molecule is
                      irreversibly split in contrast to CO2 which is released
                      again by respiration processes, we took into account the
                      Gross Primary Productivity (GPP) representing the true CO2
                      leaf flux the COS uptake has to be related to. Such a GPP
                      based deposition estimate ranged between 1.4-2.8 Tg a(-1)
                      (0.73-1.50 Tg S a(-1)). We believe that in order to obtain
                      accurate global COS sink estimates such a GPP-based estimate
                      corrected by the different deposition velocities of COS and
                      CO2 must be taken into account.},
      keywords     = {J (WoSType)},
      cin          = {ICG-I},
      ddc          = {570},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Juel1)VDB47},
      pnm          = {Chemie und Dynamik der Geo-Biosphäre},
      pid          = {G:(DE-Juel1)FUEK257},
      shelfmark    = {Ecology / Geosciences, Multidisciplinary},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      UT           = {WOS:000236195000002},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/49559},
}