001     49559
005     20240712100830.0
024 7 _ |a WOS:000236195000002
|2 WOS
024 7 _ |a 2128/20926
|2 Handle
037 _ _ |a PreJuSER-49559
041 _ _ |a eng
082 _ _ |a 570
084 _ _ |2 WoS
|a Ecology
084 _ _ |2 WoS
|a Geosciences, Multidisciplinary
100 1 _ |a Sandoval-Soto, J. S. K.
|b 0
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
245 _ _ |a Global uptake of carbonyl sulfide (COS) by terrestrial vegetation: Estimates corrected by deposition velocities normalized to the uptake of carbon dioxide (CO2)
260 _ _ |a Katlenburg-Lindau [u.a.]
|b Copernicus
|c 2005
300 _ _ |a 125 - 132
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
440 _ 0 |a Biogeosciences
|x 1726-4170
|0 14761
|v 2
500 _ _ |a Record converted from VDB: 12.11.2012
520 _ _ |a COS uptake by trees, as observed under dark/light changes and under application of the plant hormone abscisic acid, exhibited a strong correlation with the CO2 assimilation rate and the stomatal conductance. As the uptake of COS occurred exclusively through the stomata we compared experimentally derived and re-evaluated deposition velocities (V-d; related to stomatal conductance) for COS and CO2. We show that Vd of COS is generally significantly larger than that of CO2. We therefore introduced this attribute into a new global estimate of COS fluxes into vegetation. The new global estimate of the COS uptake based on available net primary productivity data (NPP) ranges between 0.69-1.40 Tg a(-1). However, as a COS molecule is irreversibly split in contrast to CO2 which is released again by respiration processes, we took into account the Gross Primary Productivity (GPP) representing the true CO2 leaf flux the COS uptake has to be related to. Such a GPP based deposition estimate ranged between 1.4-2.8 Tg a(-1) (0.73-1.50 Tg S a(-1)). We believe that in order to obtain accurate global COS sink estimates such a GPP-based estimate corrected by the different deposition velocities of COS and CO2 must be taken into account.
536 _ _ |a Chemie und Dynamik der Geo-Biosphäre
|c U01
|2 G:(DE-HGF)
|0 G:(DE-Juel1)FUEK257
|x 0
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to Web of Science
650 _ 7 |a J
|2 WoSType
700 1 _ |a Stanimirov, M.
|b 1
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
700 1 _ |a von Hobe, M.
|b 2
|u FZJ
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)VDB14301
700 1 _ |a Schmitt, V.
|b 3
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
700 1 _ |a Valdes, J.
|b 4
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
700 1 _ |a Wild, A.
|b 5
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
700 1 _ |a Kesselmeier, J.
|b 6
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
773 _ _ |g Vol. 2, p. 125 - 132
|p 125 - 132
|q 2<125 - 132
|0 PERI:(DE-600)2158181-2
|t Biogeosciences
|v 2
|y 2005
|x 1726-4170
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/49559/files/bg-2-125-2005.pdf
|y OpenAccess
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/49559/files/bg-2-125-2005.pdf?subformat=pdfa
|x pdfa
|y OpenAccess
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:49559
|p openaire
|p open_access
|p VDB
|p driver
|p dnbdelivery
913 1 _ |k U01
|v Chemie und Dynamik der Geo-Biosphäre
|l Chemie und Dynamik der Geo-Biosphäre
|b Environment (Umwelt)
|0 G:(DE-Juel1)FUEK257
|x 0
914 1 _ |y 2005
915 _ _ |a Creative Commons Attribution CC BY 3.0
|0 LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBY3
|2 HGFVOC
915 _ _ |a OpenAccess
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0510
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a JCR/ISI refereed
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0010
920 1 _ |k ICG-I
|l Stratosphäre
|d 31.12.2006
|g ICG
|0 I:(DE-Juel1)VDB47
|x 0
970 _ _ |a VDB:(DE-Juel1)77561
980 1 _ |a FullTexts
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a ConvertedRecord
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-7-20101013
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED
981 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)ICE-4-20101013
981 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-7-20101013


LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21