001     49573
005     20180211190233.0
024 7 _ |2 DOI
|a 10.2136/vzj2004.0156
024 7 _ |2 WOS
|a WOS:000234472300002
037 _ _ |a PreJuSER-49573
041 _ _ |a eng
082 _ _ |a 550
084 _ _ |2 WoS
|a Environmental Sciences
084 _ _ |2 WoS
|a Soil Science
084 _ _ |2 WoS
|a Water Resources
100 1 _ |a Weihermüller, L.
|b 0
|u FZJ
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)VDB17057
245 _ _ |a Soil water extraction with a suction cup: Results of numerical simulation
260 _ _ |a Madison, Wis.
|b SSSA
|c 2005
300 _ _ |a 899 - 907
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
440 _ 0 |a Vadose Zone Journal
|x 1539-1663
|0 10301
|v 4
500 _ _ |a Record converted from VDB: 12.11.2012
520 _ _ |a Porous cups are widely used to extract soil water for monitoring solute transport. However, it is not yet clear how the suction cup influences the matric potential in the surrounding soil and which part of the soil is sampled. This research was designed to numerically evaluate the activity domain, the extraction domain, and sampling area of a suction cup under constant infiltration. A finite- element model (HYDRUS-2D) was used to simulate the effect of various applied suctions at two infiltration rates on the water status in three soils (clay loam, sandy clay, and sand). Particle tracking was used to track the streamlines that define the sampling area and extraction of the suction cup. In general, the activity domain, the extracdomain, and sampling area of the suction cup depend primarily on the soil hydraulic parameters and the upper boundary, and secondarily on the applied suction. Results showed that the activity domain, the extraction domain, and the sampling area are largest for highest ambient hydraulic conductivities. The activity domain and the sampling area also decrease with increasing infiltration rates. Further, the activity domain of the suction cup depends strongly on the duration of water extraction. Soil heterogeneity seems to play a minor role with respect to the activity domain and sampling area of the cup.
536 _ _ |a Chemie und Dynamik der Geo-Biosphäre
|c U01
|2 G:(DE-HGF)
|0 G:(DE-Juel1)FUEK257
|x 0
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to Web of Science
650 _ 7 |a J
|2 WoSType
700 1 _ |a Kasteel, R.
|b 1
|u FZJ
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)VDB724
700 1 _ |a Vanderborght, J.
|b 2
|u FZJ
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)129548
700 1 _ |a Pütz, T.
|b 3
|u FZJ
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)VDB2346
700 1 _ |a Vereecken, H.
|b 4
|u FZJ
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)129549
773 _ _ |a 10.2136/vzj2004.0156
|g Vol. 4, p. 899 - 907
|p 899 - 907
|q 4<899 - 907
|0 PERI:(DE-600)2088189-7
|t Vadose zone journal
|v 4
|y 2005
|x 1539-1663
856 7 _ |u http://dx.doi.org/10.2136/vzj2004.0156
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:49573
|p VDB
913 1 _ |k U01
|v Chemie und Dynamik der Geo-Biosphäre
|l Chemie und Dynamik der Geo-Biosphäre
|b Environment (Umwelt)
|0 G:(DE-Juel1)FUEK257
|x 0
914 1 _ |y 2005
915 _ _ |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0010
|a JCR/ISI refereed
920 1 _ |k ICG-IV
|l Agrosphäre
|d 31.12.2006
|g ICG
|0 I:(DE-Juel1)VDB50
|x 0
970 _ _ |a VDB:(DE-Juel1)77576
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a ConvertedRecord
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED
981 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118


LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21