% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Shepard:496,
author = {Shepard, R. and Kedziora, G. and Lischka, H. and Shavitt,
I. and Müller, T. and Szalay, P.G. and Kallay, M. and Seth,
M.},
title = {{T}he {A}ccuracy of {M}olecular {B}ond {L}engths {C}omputed
by {M}ultireference {E}lectronic {S}tructure {M}ethods},
journal = {Chemical physics},
volume = {349},
issn = {0301-0104},
address = {Amsterdam [u.a.]},
publisher = {Elsevier Science},
reportid = {PreJuSER-496},
year = {2008},
note = {Record converted from VDB: 12.11.2012},
abstract = {We compare experimental R-e values with computed R-e values
for 20 molecules using three multireference electronic
structure methods, MCSCF, MR-SDCI, and MR-AQCC. Three
correlation-consistent orbital basis sets are used, along
with complete basis set extrapolations, for all of the
molecules. These data complement those computed previously
with single-reference methods. Several trends are observed.
The SCF R-e values tend to be shorter than the experimental
values, and the MCSCF values tend to be longer than the
experimental values. We attribute these trends to the ionic
contamination of the SCF wave function and to the
corresponding systematic distortion of the potential energy
curve. For the individual bonds, the MR-SDCI R-e values tend
to be shorter than the MR-AQCC values, which in turn tend to
be shorter than the MCSCF values. Compared to the previous
single-reference results, the MCSCF values are roughly
comparable to the MP4 and CCSD methods, which are more
accurate than might be expected due to the fact that these
MCSCF wave functions include no extra-valence electron
correlation effects. This suggests that static valence
correlation effects, such as near-degeneracies and the
ability to dissociate correctly to neutral fragments, play
an important role in determining the shape of the potential
energy surface, even near equilibrium structures. The
MR-SDCI and MR-AQCC methods predict R-e values with an
accuracy comparable to, or better than, the best
single-reference methods (MP4, CCSD, and CCSD(T)), despite
the fact that triple and higher excitations into the
extra-valence orbital space are included in the
single-reference methods but are absent in the
multireference wave functions. The computed R-e values using
the multireference methods tend to be smooth and monotonic
with basis set improvement. The molecular structures are
optimized using analytic energy gradients, and the timings
for these calculations show the practical advantage of using
variational wave functions for which the Hellmann-Feynman
theorem can be exploited. (c) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights
reserved.},
keywords = {J (WoSType)},
cin = {JSC},
ddc = {540},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)JSC-20090406},
pnm = {Scientific Computing},
pid = {G:(DE-Juel1)FUEK411},
shelfmark = {Chemistry, Physical / Physics, Atomic, Molecular $\&$
Chemical},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
UT = {WOS:000257538300005},
doi = {10.1016/j.chemphys.2008.03.009},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/496},
}