000049744 001__ 49744
000049744 005__ 20240712101003.0
000049744 0247_ $$2DOI$$a10.1029/2005GL024643
000049744 0247_ $$2WOS$$aWOS:000235025800003
000049744 0247_ $$2Handle$$a2128/20811
000049744 037__ $$aPreJuSER-49744
000049744 041__ $$aeng
000049744 082__ $$a550
000049744 084__ $$2WoS$$aGeosciences, Multidisciplinary
000049744 1001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aAcker, K.$$b0
000049744 245__ $$aStrong daytime production of OH from HNO2 at a rural mountain site
000049744 260__ $$aWashington, DC$$bAmerican Geophysical Union$$c2006
000049744 300__ $$aL02809
000049744 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article
000049744 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
000049744 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
000049744 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
000049744 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
000049744 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
000049744 440_0 $$02249$$aGeophysical Research Letters$$v33$$x0094-8276
000049744 500__ $$aRecord converted from VDB: 12.11.2012
000049744 520__ $$aNitrous acid and OH were measured concurrently with a number of other atmospheric components and relevant photolysis frequencies during two campaigns at the Meteorological Observatory Hohenpeissenberg (980ma.s.l.) in summer 2002 and 2004. On most of the 26 measurement days the HNO2 concentration surprisingly showed a broad maximum around noon (on average 100 pptv) and much lower concentrations during the night (similar to 30 pptv). The results indicate a strong unknown daytime source of HNO2 with a production rate on the order of 2-4 x 10(6) cm(-3) s(-1). The data demonstrate an important contribution of HNO2 to local HOx levels over the entire day, comparable with the photolysis of O-3 and HCHO. On average during the 2004 campaign, 42% of integrated photolytic HOx formation is attributable to HNO2 photolysis. Citation: Acker, K., D. Moller, W. Wieprecht, F. X. Meixner, B. Bohn, S. Gilge, C. Plass-Dulmer, and H. Berresheim (2006), Strong daytime production of OH from HNO2 at a rural mountain site, Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, L02809, doi:10.1029/2005GL024643.
000049744 536__ $$0G:(DE-Juel1)FUEK406$$2G:(DE-HGF)$$aAtmosphäre und Klima$$cP22$$x0
000049744 588__ $$aDataset connected to Web of Science
000049744 650_7 $$2WoSType$$aJ
000049744 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aMöller, D.$$b1
000049744 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aWieprecht, W.$$b2
000049744 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aMeixner, F. X.$$b3
000049744 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)2693$$aBohn, B.$$b4$$uFZJ
000049744 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aGilge, S.$$b5
000049744 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aPlass-Dülmer, Ch.$$b6
000049744 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aBerresheim, H.$$b7
000049744 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)2021599-X$$a10.1029/2005GL024643$$gVol. 33, p. L02809$$pL02809$$q33<L02809$$tGeophysical research letters$$v33$$x0094-8276$$y2006
000049744 8567_ $$uhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2005GL024643
000049744 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/49744/files/2005GL024643.pdf$$yOpenAccess
000049744 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/49744/files/2005GL024643.pdf?subformat=pdfa$$xpdfa$$yOpenAccess
000049744 909CO $$ooai:juser.fz-juelich.de:49744$$pdnbdelivery$$pdriver$$pVDB$$popen_access$$popenaire
000049744 9131_ $$0G:(DE-Juel1)FUEK406$$bUmwelt$$kP22$$lAtmosphäre und Klima$$vAtmosphäre und Klima$$x0$$zfortgesetzt als P23
000049744 9141_ $$y2006
000049744 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0510$$2StatID$$aOpenAccess
000049744 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0010$$aJCR/ISI refereed
000049744 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)VDB48$$d31.12.2006$$gICG$$kICG-II$$lTroposphäre$$x0
000049744 970__ $$aVDB:(DE-Juel1)77821
000049744 9801_ $$aFullTexts
000049744 980__ $$aVDB
000049744 980__ $$aConvertedRecord
000049744 980__ $$ajournal
000049744 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)IEK-8-20101013
000049744 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED
000049744 981__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)ICE-3-20101013
000049744 981__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)IEK-8-20101013