% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Groo:52348,
      author       = {Grooß, J.-U. and Müller, R.},
      title        = {{S}imulation of ozone loss in the {A}rctic winter 2004/05},
      journal      = {Geophysical research letters},
      volume       = {34},
      issn         = {0094-8276},
      address      = {Washington, DC},
      publisher    = {American Geophysical Union},
      reportid     = {PreJuSER-52348},
      pages        = {L05804},
      year         = {2007},
      note         = {Record converted from VDB: 12.11.2012},
      comment      = {Geophysical Research Letters},
      booktitle     = {Geophysical Research Letters},
      abstract     = {We present simulations of stratospheric ozone depletion in
                      the Arctic winter 2004/2005 by the Chemical Lagrangian Model
                      of the Stratosphere (CLaMS). This winter is among the
                      coldest on record with large observed ozone losses. It is
                      also different from previously analyzed winters, as ozone
                      mixing ratios within the polar vortex were not homogeneously
                      distributed. The reason for the untypical ozone distribution
                      is a second transport barrier that existed at the time of
                      vortex formation. The simulations agree well with ozone
                      measurements by the Fourier Transform Spectrometer
                      (ACE-FTS). The simulated vortex average column ozone loss
                      between 380 and 550 K potential temperature (+/- 1 sigma)
                      was 69 +/- 21 Dobson Units on 23 March. The simulated ozone
                      loss is in approximate agreement with some published
                      estimates, but is significantly lower than others. A
                      possible reason for this difference is the inhomogeneous
                      ozone distribution within the vortex which makes it more
                      complicated to estimate of ozone loss.},
      keywords     = {J (WoSType)},
      cin          = {ICG-1},
      ddc          = {550},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Juel1)VDB790},
      pnm          = {Atmosphäre und Klima},
      pid          = {G:(DE-Juel1)FUEK406},
      shelfmark    = {Geosciences, Multidisciplinary},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      UT           = {WOS:000244707200008},
      doi          = {10.1029/2006GL028901},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/52348},
}