001     52616
005     20180211191413.0
024 7 _ |2 pmid
|a pmid:17048010
024 7 _ |2 DOI
|a 10.1007/s00442-006-0576-z
024 7 _ |2 WOS
|a WOS:000244302500002
037 _ _ |a PreJuSER-52616
041 _ _ |a eng
082 _ _ |a 590
084 _ _ |2 WoS
|a Ecology
100 1 _ |a Temperton, V. M.
|b 0
|u FZJ
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)129409
245 _ _ |a Positive interactions between nitrogen-fixing legumes and four different neighbouring species in a biodiversity experiment
260 _ _ |a Berlin
|b Springer
|c 2007
300 _ _ |a 190 - 205
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
440 _ 0 |a Oecologia
|x 0029-8549
|0 15661
|v 151
500 _ _ |a Record converted from VDB: 12.11.2012
520 _ _ |a The importance of facilitative processes due to the presence of nitrogen-fixing legumes in temperate grasslands is a contentious issue in biodiversity experiments. Despite a multitude of studies of fertilization effects of legumes on associated nonfixers in agricultural systems, we know little about the dynamics in more diverse systems. We hypothesised that the identity of target plant species (phytometers) and the diversity of neighbouring plant species would affect the magnitude of such positive species interactions. We therefore sampled aboveground tissues of phytometers planted into all plots of a grassland biodiversity-ecosystem functioning experiment and analysed their N concentrations, delta15N values and biomasses. The four phytometer species (Festuca pratensis, Plantago lanceolata, Knautia arvensis and Trifolium pratensis) each belonged to one of the four plant functional groups used in the experiment and allowed the effects of diversity on N dynamics in individual species to be assessed. We found significantly lower delta15N values and higher N concentrations and N contents (amount of N per plant) in phytometer species growing with legumes, indicating a facilitative role for legumes in these grassland ecosystems. Our data suggest that the main driving force behind these facilitative interactions in plots containing legumes was reduced competition for soil nitrate ("nitrate sparing"), with apparent N transfer playing a secondary role. Interestingly, species richness (and to a lesser extent functional group number) significantly decreased delta15N values, N concentrations and N content irrespective of any legume effect. Possible mechanisms behind this effect, such as increased N mineralisation and nitrate uptake in more diverse plots, now need further investigation. The magnitude of the positive interactions depended on the identity of the phytometer species. Evidence for increased N uptake in communities containing legumes was found in all three nonlegume phytometer species, with a subsequent strong increase in biomass in the grass F. pratensis across all diversity levels, and a lesser biomass gain in P. lanceolata and K. arvensis. In contrast, the legume phytometer species T. pratense was negatively affected when other legumes were present in their host communities across all diversity levels.
536 _ _ |a Terrestrische Umwelt
|c P24
|2 G:(DE-HGF)
|0 G:(DE-Juel1)FUEK407
|x 0
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to Web of Science, Pubmed
650 _ 2 |2 MeSH
|a Biodiversity
650 _ 2 |2 MeSH
|a Biomass
650 _ 2 |2 MeSH
|a Dipsacaceae: chemistry
650 _ 2 |2 MeSH
|a Ecosystem
650 _ 2 |2 MeSH
|a Fabaceae: metabolism
650 _ 2 |2 MeSH
|a Festuca: chemistry
650 _ 2 |2 MeSH
|a Germany
650 _ 2 |2 MeSH
|a Nitrogen: analysis
650 _ 2 |2 MeSH
|a Nitrogen: metabolism
650 _ 2 |2 MeSH
|a Plantago: chemistry
650 _ 2 |2 MeSH
|a Population Dynamics
650 _ 2 |2 MeSH
|a Species Specificity
650 _ 2 |2 MeSH
|a Trifolium: chemistry
650 _ 7 |0 7727-37-9
|2 NLM Chemicals
|a Nitrogen
650 _ 7 |a J
|2 WoSType
653 2 0 |2 Author
|a facilitation
653 2 0 |2 Author
|a nitrogen
653 2 0 |2 Author
|a delta N-15 value
653 2 0 |2 Author
|a stable isotopes
653 2 0 |2 Author
|a the Jena experiment
700 1 _ |a Mwangi, P. N.
|b 1
|u FZJ
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)VDB67242
700 1 _ |a Scherer-Lorenzen, M.
|b 2
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
700 1 _ |a Schmid, B.
|b 3
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
700 1 _ |a Buchmann, N.
|b 4
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
773 _ _ |a 10.1007/s00442-006-0576-z
|g Vol. 151, p. 190 - 205
|p 190 - 205
|q 151<190 - 205
|0 PERI:(DE-600)1462019-4
|t Oecologia
|v 151
|y 2007
|x 0029-8549
856 7 _ |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00442-006-0576-z
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:52616
|p VDB
913 1 _ |k P24
|v Terrestrische Umwelt
|l Terrestrische Umwelt
|b Erde und Umwelt
|0 G:(DE-Juel1)FUEK407
|x 0
914 1 _ |y 2007
915 _ _ |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0010
|a JCR/ISI refereed
920 1 _ |k ICG-3
|l Phytosphäre
|d 31.10.2010
|g ICG
|0 I:(DE-Juel1)ICG-3-20090406
|x 1
970 _ _ |a VDB:(DE-Juel1)82745
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a ConvertedRecord
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-2-20101118
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED
981 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-2-20101118
981 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)ICG-3-20090406


LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21