001     52843
005     20200423204352.0
024 7 _ |a pmid:17002407
|2 pmid
024 7 _ |a 10.1021/jf061042v
|2 DOI
024 7 _ |a WOS:000240795400007
|2 WOS
024 7 _ |a 2128/798
|2 Handle
037 _ _ |a PreJuSER-52843
041 _ _ |a eng
082 _ _ |a 630
084 _ _ |2 WoS
|a Agriculture, Multidisciplinary
084 _ _ |2 WoS
|a Chemistry, Applied
084 _ _ |2 WoS
|a Food Science & Technology
100 1 _ |a Lagarde, F.
|b 0
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
245 _ _ |a Simultaneous Determination of Ethidimuron, Methabenzthiazuron, and Their Two Major Degradation Products in Soil
260 _ _ |a Washington, DC [u.a.]
|b American Chemical Society (ACS)
|c 2006
300 _ _ |a 7450 - 7459
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
440 _ 0 |a Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
|x 0021-8561
|0 3005
|v 54
500 _ _ |a Record converted from VDB: 12.11.2012
520 _ _ |a An analytical method has been developed for the quantification of two herbicides (ethidimuron and methabenzthiazuron) and their two main soil derivatives. This method involves fluidized-bed extraction (FBE) prior to cleanup and analysis by reverse-phase liquid chromatography with UV detection at 282 nm. FBE conditions were established to provide efficient extraction without degradation of the four analytes. (14)C-labeled compounds were used for the optimization of extraction and purification steps and for the determination of related efficiencies. Extraction was optimal using a fexIKA extractor operating at 110 degrees C for three cycles (total time = 95 min) with 75 g of soil and 150 mL of a 60:40 v/v acetone/water mixture. Extracts were further purified on a 500 mg silica SPE cartridge. Separation was performed on a C18 Purosphere column (250 mm x 4 mm i.d.), at 0.8 mL min(-1) and 30 degrees C with an elution gradient made up of phosphoric acid aqueous solution (pH 2.2) and acetonitrile. Calibration curves were found to be linear in the 0.5-50 mg L(-1) concentration range. Besides freshly spiked soil samples, method validation included the analysis of samples with aged residues. Recovery values, determined from spiked samples, were close to 100%. Limits of detection ranged between 2 and 3 microg kg(-1) of dry soil and limits of quantification between 8 and 10 microg kg(-1) of dry soil. An attempt to improve these performances by using fluorescence detection following postcolumn derivatization by orthophthalaldehyde-mercaptoethanol reagent was unsuccessful.
536 _ _ |a Terrestrische Umwelt
|c P24
|2 G:(DE-HGF)
|0 G:(DE-Juel1)FUEK407
|x 0
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to Web of Science, Pubmed
650 _ 2 |2 MeSH
|a Benzothiazoles: analysis
650 _ 2 |2 MeSH
|a Benzothiazoles: chemistry
650 _ 2 |2 MeSH
|a Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid: methods
650 _ 2 |2 MeSH
|a Herbicides: analysis
650 _ 2 |2 MeSH
|a Methylurea Compounds: analysis
650 _ 2 |2 MeSH
|a Methylurea Compounds: chemistry
650 _ 2 |2 MeSH
|a Photolysis
650 _ 2 |2 MeSH
|a Sensitivity and Specificity
650 _ 2 |2 MeSH
|a Soil: analysis
650 _ 2 |2 MeSH
|a Solutions
650 _ 7 |0 0
|2 NLM Chemicals
|a Benzothiazoles
650 _ 7 |0 0
|2 NLM Chemicals
|a Herbicides
650 _ 7 |0 0
|2 NLM Chemicals
|a Methylurea Compounds
650 _ 7 |0 0
|2 NLM Chemicals
|a Soil
650 _ 7 |0 0
|2 NLM Chemicals
|a Solutions
650 _ 7 |0 0
|2 NLM Chemicals
|a ethidimuron
650 _ 7 |0 18691-97-9
|2 NLM Chemicals
|a methabenzthiazuron
650 _ 7 |a J
|2 WoSType
653 2 0 |2 Author
|a ethidimuron
653 2 0 |2 Author
|a methabenzthiazuron
653 2 0 |2 Author
|a metabolites
653 2 0 |2 Author
|a soils
653 2 0 |2 Author
|a fexIKA extraction
653 2 0 |2 Author
|a SPE purification
653 2 0 |2 Author
|a HPLC-DAD
653 2 0 |2 Author
|a fluorescence
700 1 _ |a Pütz, T.
|b 1
|u FZJ
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)VDB2346
700 1 _ |a Dressel, J.
|b 2
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
700 1 _ |a Führ, F.
|b 3
|u FZJ
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)VDB428
773 _ _ |a 10.1021/jf061042v
|g Vol. 54, p. 7450 - 7459
|p 7450 - 7459
|q 54<7450 - 7459
|0 PERI:(DE-600)1483109-0
|t Journal of agricultural and food chemistry
|v 54
|y 2006
|x 0021-8561
856 7 _ |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jf061042v
|u http://hdl.handle.net/2128/798
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/52843/files/83145.pdf
|y OpenAccess
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/52843/files/83145.jpg?subformat=icon-1440
|x icon-1440
|y OpenAccess
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/52843/files/83145.jpg?subformat=icon-180
|x icon-180
|y OpenAccess
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/52843/files/83145.jpg?subformat=icon-640
|x icon-640
|y OpenAccess
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:52843
|p openaire
|p open_access
|p driver
|p VDB
|p dnbdelivery
913 1 _ |k P24
|v Terrestrische Umwelt
|l Terrestrische Umwelt
|b Erde und Umwelt
|0 G:(DE-Juel1)FUEK407
|x 0
914 1 _ |y 2006
915 _ _ |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0010
|a JCR/ISI refereed
915 _ _ |2 StatID
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0510
|a OpenAccess
920 1 _ |k ICG-IV
|l Agrosphäre
|d 31.12.2006
|g ICG
|0 I:(DE-Juel1)VDB50
|x 0
970 _ _ |a VDB:(DE-Juel1)83145
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a JUWEL
980 _ _ |a ConvertedRecord
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED
980 _ _ |a FullTexts
980 1 _ |a FullTexts
981 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118


LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21