% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{vandenBosch:52908,
author = {van den Bosch, I. and Lambot, S. and Druyts, P. and Huynen,
I. and Acheroy, M.},
title = {{B}uried target signature extraction from
ground-penetrating radar signal: measurements and
simulations},
journal = {Near surface geophysics},
volume = {4},
issn = {1569-4445},
address = {Houten},
publisher = {EAGE},
reportid = {PreJuSER-52908},
pages = {31 - 38},
year = {2006},
note = {Record converted from VDB: 12.11.2012},
abstract = {Ground-penetrating radar (GPR) proves to be a very valuable
tool in the field of humanitarian demining, especially for
the detection of plastic land-mines. Recently, a monostatic
stepped-frequency continuous-wave (SFCW) GPR, together with
a conceptual model of the radar-antenna-soil system, has
been developed for the characterization of the
electromagnetic parameters of soil, i.e. dielectric
permittivity (epsilon), magnetic permeability (mu) and
electric conductivity (sigma). This approach is extended
here to the extraction of the GPR signal and to modelling
the signatures of buried targets. The equivalence principle
is used to decompose the GPR signal into its soil and
target-in-soil components, as well as to model the
radar-soil-target system. It permits the soil contribution
to be subtracted from the total GPR signal to provide the
signature of the buried target. This signature is compared
to simulations. For a proof of the concept, the GPR return
signal from a buried metal sphere has been simulated using
the Method of Moments and it shows good agreement with its
measured counterpart. We also have extracted clean
frequency- and time-domain signatures of a PMN-2 plastic
mine embedded in a multilayered medium, subject to various
water contents. The method is also applied to a B-scan above
a buried conducting cylinder. Finally, a study of the main
sources of errors in the extraction of the signature of a
buried target shows that mistakes in antenna height
measurement lead to errors more important than those due to
misestimating the relative dielectric permittivity of the
soil.},
keywords = {J (WoSType)},
cin = {ICG-IV},
ddc = {550},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)VDB50},
pnm = {Terrestrische Umwelt},
pid = {G:(DE-Juel1)FUEK407},
shelfmark = {Geochemistry $\&$ Geophysics},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
UT = {WOS:000235242800006},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/52908},
}