% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Lambot:53355,
author = {Lambot, S. and Weihermüller, L. and Huisman, J. A. and
Vereecken, H. and Vanclooster, M. and Slob, E. C.},
title = {{A}nalysis of air-launched ground-penetrating radar
techniques to measure the soil surface water content},
journal = {Water resources research},
volume = {42},
issn = {0043-1397},
address = {Washington, DC},
publisher = {AGU},
reportid = {PreJuSER-53355},
pages = {W11403},
year = {2006},
note = {Record converted from VDB: 12.11.2012},
abstract = {We analyze the common surface reflection and full-wave
inversion methods to retrieve the soil surface dielectric
permittivity and correlated water content from air-launched
ground-penetrating radar (GPR) measurements. In the
full-wave approach, antenna effects are filtered out from
the raw radar data in the frequency domain, and full-wave
inversion is performed in the time domain, on a time window
focused on the surface reflection. Synthetic experiments are
performed to investigate the most critical hypotheses on
which both techniques rely, namely, the negligible effects
of the soil electric conductivity (s) and layering. In the
frequency range 1-2 GHz we show that for sigma>0.1 Sm-1,
significant errors are made on the estimated parameters, e.
g., an absolute error of 0.10 in water content may be
observed for sigma=1 Sm-1. This threshold is more stringent
with decreasing frequency. Contrasting surface layering may
proportionally lead to significant errors when the thickness
of the surface layer is close to one fourth the wavelength
in the medium, which corresponds to the depth resolution.
Absolute errors may be >0.10 in water content for large
contrasts. Yet we show that full-wave inversion presents
valuable advantages compared to the common surface
reflection method. First, filtering antenna effects may
prevent absolute errors >0.04 in water content, depending of
the antenna height. Second, the critical reference
measurements above a perfect electric conductor (PEC) are
not required, and the height of the antenna does not need to
be known a priori. This averts absolute errors of 0.02-0.09
in water content when antenna height differences of 1-5 cm
occur between the soil and the PEC. A laboratory experiment
is finally presented to analyze the stability of the
estimates with respect to actual measurement and modeling
errors. While the conditions were particularly well suited
for applying the common reflection method, better results
were obtained using full-wave inversion.},
keywords = {J (WoSType)},
cin = {ICG-IV / JARA-ENERGY},
ddc = {550},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)VDB50 / $I:(DE-82)080011_20140620$},
pnm = {Terrestrische Umwelt},
pid = {G:(DE-Juel1)FUEK407},
shelfmark = {Environmental Sciences / Limnology / Water Resources},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
UT = {WOS:000241871400002},
doi = {10.1029/2006WR005097},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/53355},
}