% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Tripathi:53477,
      author       = {Tripathi, O. P. and Godin-Beekmann, S. and Pazmino, A. and
                      Lefevree, F. and Marchand, M. and Hauchecorne, A. and
                      Goutail, F. and Schlager, H. and Volk, C. M. and Johnson, B.
                      and König-Langlo, G. and Balestri, S. and Stroh, F. and
                      Bui, T. P. and Jost, H. J. and Deshler, T. and von der
                      Gathen, P.},
      title        = {{H}igh resolution simulation of recent {A}rctic and
                      {A}ntarctic stratospheric chemical ozone loss compared to
                      observations},
      journal      = {Journal of atmospheric chemistry},
      volume       = {55},
      issn         = {0167-7764},
      address      = {Dordrecht [u.a.]},
      publisher    = {Springer Science + Business Media B.V},
      reportid     = {PreJuSER-53477},
      pages        = {205 - 226},
      year         = {2006},
      note         = {Record converted from VDB: 12.11.2012},
      abstract     = {Simulations of polar ozone losses were performed using the
                      three-dimensional high-resolution (1 degrees x 1 degrees)
                      chemical transport model MIMOSA-CHIM. Three Arctic winters
                      1999-2000, 2001-2002, 2002-2003 and three Antarctic winters
                      2001, 2002, and 2003 were considered for the study. The
                      cumulative ozone loss in the Arctic winter 2002-2003 reached
                      around $35\%$ at 475 K inside the vortex, as compared to
                      more than $60\%$ in 1999-2000. During 1999-2000,
                      denitrification induces a maximum of about $23\%$ extra
                      ozone loss at 475 K as compared to $17\%$ in 2002-2003.
                      Unlike these two colder Arctic winters, the 2001-2002 Arctic
                      was warmer and did not experience much ozone loss.
                      Sensitivity tests showed that the chosen resolution of 1
                      degrees x 1 degrees provides a better evaluation of ozone
                      loss at the edge of the polar vortex in high solar zenith
                      angle conditions. The simulation results for ozone, ClO,
                      HNO3, N2O, and NOy for winters 1999-2000 and 2002-2003 were
                      compared with measurements on board ER-2 and Geophysica
                      aircraft respectively. Sensitivity tests showed that
                      increasing heating rates calculated by the model by $50\%$
                      and doubling the PSC (Polar Stratospheric Clouds) particle
                      density (from 5 x 10(-3) to 10(-2) cm(-3)) refines the
                      agreement with in situ ozone, N2O and NOy levels. In this
                      configuration, simulated ClO levels are increased and are in
                      better agreement with observations in January but are
                      overestimated by about $20\%$ in March. The use of the
                      Burkholder et al. (1990) Cl2O2 absorption cross-sections
                      slightly increases further ClO levels especially in high
                      solar zenith angle conditions. Comparisons of the modelled
                      ozone values with ozonesonde measurement in the Antarctic
                      winter 2003 and with Polar Ozone and Aerosol Measurement III
                      (POAM III) measurements in the Antarctic winters 2001 and
                      2002, shows that the simulations underestimate the ozone
                      loss rate at the end of the ozone destruction period. A
                      slightly better agreement is obtained with the use of
                      Burkholder et al. (1990) Cl2O2 absorption cross-sections.},
      keywords     = {J (WoSType)},
      cin          = {ICG-I},
      ddc          = {540},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Juel1)VDB47},
      pnm          = {Atmosphäre und Klima},
      pid          = {G:(DE-Juel1)FUEK406},
      shelfmark    = {Environmental Sciences / Meteorology $\&$ Atmospheric
                      Sciences},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      UT           = {WOS:000241797000002},
      doi          = {10.1007/s10874-006-9028-8},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/53477},
}