001     53477
005     20240709074213.0
024 7 _ |2 DOI
|a 10.1007/s10874-006-9028-8
024 7 _ |2 WOS
|a WOS:000241797000002
037 _ _ |a PreJuSER-53477
041 _ _ |a eng
082 _ _ |a 540
084 _ _ |2 WoS
|a Environmental Sciences
084 _ _ |2 WoS
|a Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences
100 1 _ |a Tripathi, O. P.
|b 0
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
245 _ _ |a High resolution simulation of recent Arctic and Antarctic stratospheric chemical ozone loss compared to observations
260 _ _ |a Dordrecht [u.a.]
|b Springer Science + Business Media B.V
|c 2006
300 _ _ |a 205 - 226
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
440 _ 0 |a Journal of Atmospheric Chemistry
|x 0167-7764
|0 3073
|y 3
|v 55
500 _ _ |a Record converted from VDB: 12.11.2012
520 _ _ |a Simulations of polar ozone losses were performed using the three-dimensional high-resolution (1 degrees x 1 degrees) chemical transport model MIMOSA-CHIM. Three Arctic winters 1999-2000, 2001-2002, 2002-2003 and three Antarctic winters 2001, 2002, and 2003 were considered for the study. The cumulative ozone loss in the Arctic winter 2002-2003 reached around 35% at 475 K inside the vortex, as compared to more than 60% in 1999-2000. During 1999-2000, denitrification induces a maximum of about 23% extra ozone loss at 475 K as compared to 17% in 2002-2003. Unlike these two colder Arctic winters, the 2001-2002 Arctic was warmer and did not experience much ozone loss. Sensitivity tests showed that the chosen resolution of 1 degrees x 1 degrees provides a better evaluation of ozone loss at the edge of the polar vortex in high solar zenith angle conditions. The simulation results for ozone, ClO, HNO3, N2O, and NOy for winters 1999-2000 and 2002-2003 were compared with measurements on board ER-2 and Geophysica aircraft respectively. Sensitivity tests showed that increasing heating rates calculated by the model by 50% and doubling the PSC (Polar Stratospheric Clouds) particle density (from 5 x 10(-3) to 10(-2) cm(-3)) refines the agreement with in situ ozone, N2O and NOy levels. In this configuration, simulated ClO levels are increased and are in better agreement with observations in January but are overestimated by about 20% in March. The use of the Burkholder et al. (1990) Cl2O2 absorption cross-sections slightly increases further ClO levels especially in high solar zenith angle conditions. Comparisons of the modelled ozone values with ozonesonde measurement in the Antarctic winter 2003 and with Polar Ozone and Aerosol Measurement III (POAM III) measurements in the Antarctic winters 2001 and 2002, shows that the simulations underestimate the ozone loss rate at the end of the ozone destruction period. A slightly better agreement is obtained with the use of Burkholder et al. (1990) Cl2O2 absorption cross-sections.
536 _ _ |a Atmosphäre und Klima
|c P22
|2 G:(DE-HGF)
|0 G:(DE-Juel1)FUEK406
|x 0
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to Web of Science
650 _ 7 |a J
|2 WoSType
653 2 0 |2 Author
|a comparison with observations
653 2 0 |2 Author
|a high-resolution 3-D chemical transport model
653 2 0 |2 Author
|a ozone loss
653 2 0 |2 Author
|a stratospheric chemistry
653 2 0 |2 Author
|a polar ozone
653 2 0 |2 Author
|a sensitivity tests
700 1 _ |a Godin-Beekmann, S.
|b 1
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
700 1 _ |a Pazmino, A.
|b 2
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
700 1 _ |a Lefevree, F.
|b 3
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
700 1 _ |a Marchand, M.
|b 4
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
700 1 _ |a Hauchecorne, A.
|b 5
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
700 1 _ |a Goutail, F.
|b 6
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
700 1 _ |a Schlager, H.
|b 7
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
700 1 _ |a Volk, C. M.
|b 8
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
700 1 _ |a Johnson, B.
|b 9
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
700 1 _ |a König-Langlo, G.
|b 10
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
700 1 _ |a Balestri, S.
|b 11
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
700 1 _ |a Stroh, F.
|b 12
|u FZJ
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)129158
700 1 _ |a Bui, T. P.
|b 13
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
700 1 _ |a Jost, H. J.
|b 14
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
700 1 _ |a Deshler, T.
|b 15
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
700 1 _ |a von der Gathen, P.
|b 16
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
773 _ _ |a 10.1007/s10874-006-9028-8
|g Vol. 55, p. 205 - 226
|p 205 - 226
|q 55<205 - 226
|0 PERI:(DE-600)1475524-5
|t Journal of atmospheric chemistry
|v 55
|y 2006
|x 0167-7764
856 7 _ |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10874-006-9028-8
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:53477
|p VDB
913 1 _ |k P22
|v Atmosphäre und Klima
|l Atmosphäre und Klima
|b Umwelt
|z fortgesetzt als P23
|0 G:(DE-Juel1)FUEK406
|x 0
914 1 _ |y 2006
915 _ _ |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0010
|a JCR/ISI refereed
920 1 _ |k ICG-I
|l Stratosphäre
|d 31.12.2006
|g ICG
|0 I:(DE-Juel1)VDB47
|x 0
970 _ _ |a VDB:(DE-Juel1)84018
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a ConvertedRecord
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-7-20101013
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED
981 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)ICE-4-20101013
981 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-7-20101013


LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21