000000542 001__ 542
000000542 005__ 20161225224204.0
000000542 0247_ $$2pmid$$apmid:18331801
000000542 0247_ $$2DOI$$a10.1016/j.concog.2008.01.008
000000542 0247_ $$2WOS$$aWOS:000258259500012
000000542 037__ $$aPreJuSER-542
000000542 041__ $$aeng
000000542 082__ $$a150
000000542 1001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)VDB67315$$aHeinzel, A.$$b0$$uFZJ
000000542 245__ $$aNeural correlates of subliminal and supraliminal letter processing - An event-related fMRI study
000000542 260__ $$aOrlando, Fla.$$bAcademic Press$$c2008
000000542 300__ $$a699 - 713
000000542 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article
000000542 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
000000542 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
000000542 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
000000542 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
000000542 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
000000542 440_0 $$018782$$aConsciousness and cognition : an international journal$$v17$$x1053-8100$$y3
000000542 500__ $$aRecord converted from VDB: 12.11.2012
000000542 520__ $$aOne problem of interpreting research on subconscious processing is the possibility that participants are weakly conscious of the stimuli. Here, we compared the fMRI BOLD response in healthy adults to clearly visible single letters (supraliminal presentation) with the response to letters presented in the absence of any behavioural evidence of visibility (subliminal presentation). No letter catch trials served as a control condition. Forced-choice responses did not differ from chance when letter-to-background contrast was low, whereas they were almost 100% correct when contrast was high. A comparison of fMRI BOLD signals for supraliminal and subliminal letters with the control trials revealed a signal increase in left BA 37 (fusiform gyrus). Comparison of supraliminal with subliminal letters showed a significant increase in the right inferior frontal gyrus (BA 44, partly extending to BA 9 and BA 45, as well as BA 46). Finally, a comparison of subliminal with supraliminal letters showed increases in the left middle temporal gyrus (BA 21) and the right extrastriate cortex (BA 19).
000000542 536__ $$0G:(DE-Juel1)FUEK409$$2G:(DE-HGF)$$aFunktion und Dysfunktion des Nervensystems$$cP33$$x0
000000542 588__ $$aDataset connected to Pubmed
000000542 650_2 $$2MeSH$$aAdult
000000542 650_2 $$2MeSH$$aBrain: physiology
000000542 650_2 $$2MeSH$$aHumans
000000542 650_2 $$2MeSH$$aLinguistics
000000542 650_2 $$2MeSH$$aMagnetic Resonance Imaging
000000542 650_2 $$2MeSH$$aMale
000000542 650_2 $$2MeSH$$aUnconscious (Psychology)
000000542 650_2 $$2MeSH$$aVisual Perception
000000542 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)VDB571$$aHautzel, H.$$b1$$uFZJ
000000542 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)VDB22367$$aPoeppel, T. D.$$b2$$uFZJ
000000542 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)VDB131$$aBoers, F.$$b3$$uFZJ
000000542 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)VDB100$$aBeu, M.$$b4$$uFZJ
000000542 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)VDB78236$$aMueller, H.-W.$$b5$$uFZJ
000000542 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)1462916-1$$a10.1016/j.concog.2008.01.008$$gVol. 17, p. 699 - 713$$p699 - 713$$q17<699 - 713$$tConsciousness and cognition$$v17$$x1053-8100$$y2008
000000542 8567_ $$uhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2008.01.008
000000542 909CO $$ooai:juser.fz-juelich.de:542$$pVDB
000000542 9131_ $$0G:(DE-Juel1)FUEK409$$bGesundheit$$kP33$$lFunktion und Dysfunktion des Nervensystems$$vFunktion und Dysfunktion des Nervensystems$$x0
000000542 9141_ $$y2008
000000542 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0020$$aNo peer review
000000542 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)INB-3-20090406$$d31.12.2008$$gINB$$kINB-3$$lMedizin$$x0
000000542 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)VDB145$$gKME$$kKME$$lKlinisch-Medizinische Einrichtungen (Univ. Düsseldorf)$$x1
000000542 970__ $$aVDB:(DE-Juel1)101161
000000542 980__ $$aVDB
000000542 980__ $$aConvertedRecord
000000542 980__ $$ajournal
000000542 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)INB-3-20090406
000000542 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)VDB145
000000542 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED
000000542 981__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)VDB145