001     542
005     20161225224204.0
024 7 _ |2 pmid
|a pmid:18331801
024 7 _ |2 DOI
|a 10.1016/j.concog.2008.01.008
024 7 _ |2 WOS
|a WOS:000258259500012
037 _ _ |a PreJuSER-542
041 _ _ |a eng
082 _ _ |a 150
100 1 _ |a Heinzel, A.
|b 0
|u FZJ
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)VDB67315
245 _ _ |a Neural correlates of subliminal and supraliminal letter processing - An event-related fMRI study
260 _ _ |a Orlando, Fla.
|b Academic Press
|c 2008
300 _ _ |a 699 - 713
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
440 _ 0 |a Consciousness and cognition : an international journal
|x 1053-8100
|0 18782
|y 3
|v 17
500 _ _ |a Record converted from VDB: 12.11.2012
520 _ _ |a One problem of interpreting research on subconscious processing is the possibility that participants are weakly conscious of the stimuli. Here, we compared the fMRI BOLD response in healthy adults to clearly visible single letters (supraliminal presentation) with the response to letters presented in the absence of any behavioural evidence of visibility (subliminal presentation). No letter catch trials served as a control condition. Forced-choice responses did not differ from chance when letter-to-background contrast was low, whereas they were almost 100% correct when contrast was high. A comparison of fMRI BOLD signals for supraliminal and subliminal letters with the control trials revealed a signal increase in left BA 37 (fusiform gyrus). Comparison of supraliminal with subliminal letters showed a significant increase in the right inferior frontal gyrus (BA 44, partly extending to BA 9 and BA 45, as well as BA 46). Finally, a comparison of subliminal with supraliminal letters showed increases in the left middle temporal gyrus (BA 21) and the right extrastriate cortex (BA 19).
536 _ _ |a Funktion und Dysfunktion des Nervensystems
|c P33
|2 G:(DE-HGF)
|0 G:(DE-Juel1)FUEK409
|x 0
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to Pubmed
650 _ 2 |2 MeSH
|a Adult
650 _ 2 |2 MeSH
|a Brain: physiology
650 _ 2 |2 MeSH
|a Humans
650 _ 2 |2 MeSH
|a Linguistics
650 _ 2 |2 MeSH
|a Magnetic Resonance Imaging
650 _ 2 |2 MeSH
|a Male
650 _ 2 |2 MeSH
|a Unconscious (Psychology)
650 _ 2 |2 MeSH
|a Visual Perception
700 1 _ |a Hautzel, H.
|b 1
|u FZJ
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)VDB571
700 1 _ |a Poeppel, T. D.
|b 2
|u FZJ
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)VDB22367
700 1 _ |a Boers, F.
|b 3
|u FZJ
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)VDB131
700 1 _ |a Beu, M.
|b 4
|u FZJ
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)VDB100
700 1 _ |a Mueller, H.-W.
|b 5
|u FZJ
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)VDB78236
773 _ _ |a 10.1016/j.concog.2008.01.008
|g Vol. 17, p. 699 - 713
|p 699 - 713
|q 17<699 - 713
|0 PERI:(DE-600)1462916-1
|t Consciousness and cognition
|v 17
|y 2008
|x 1053-8100
856 7 _ |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2008.01.008
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:542
|p VDB
913 1 _ |k P33
|v Funktion und Dysfunktion des Nervensystems
|l Funktion und Dysfunktion des Nervensystems
|b Gesundheit
|0 G:(DE-Juel1)FUEK409
|x 0
914 1 _ |y 2008
915 _ _ |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0020
|a No peer review
920 1 _ |k INB-3
|l Medizin
|d 31.12.2008
|g INB
|0 I:(DE-Juel1)INB-3-20090406
|x 0
920 1 _ |k KME
|l Klinisch-Medizinische Einrichtungen (Univ. Düsseldorf)
|g KME
|0 I:(DE-Juel1)VDB145
|x 1
970 _ _ |a VDB:(DE-Juel1)101161
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a ConvertedRecord
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)INB-3-20090406
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)VDB145
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED
981 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)VDB145


LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21