% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Kasteel:5525,
author = {Kasteel, R. and Pütz, T. and Vanderborght, J. and
Vereecken, H.},
title = {{S}olute {S}preading under {T}ransient {C}onditions in a
{F}ield {S}oil},
journal = {Vadose zone journal},
volume = {8},
issn = {1539-1663},
address = {Madison, Wis.},
publisher = {SSSA},
reportid = {PreJuSER-5525},
pages = {690 - 702},
year = {2009},
note = {This study was carried out in cooperation with the
Agricultural Center Monheim, Bayer CropScience, Monheim,
Germany. We would like to thank Drs. B. Brumhard, K. Scholz,
H. Schafer, and A. Stork of Bayer CropScience for fruitful
discussions during this project. We are also grateful to
Drs. A. Wustemeyer and R. Kaiser from the former Institute
of Radioagronomy: ICG-5 at Forschungszentrum Julich for
designing and carrying out the experimental field work.},
abstract = {Lateral mass redistribution in soils is the key to
understanding field-scale solute transport, but the
underlying assumptions of common transport theories are
violated under transient-flow conditions. We tested the
applicability of two limiting cases for solute spreading
under transient-flow conditions in the field after an
appropriate time coordinate transformation: no lateral mass
redistribution, described by the convective-lognormal
transfer function (CLT), vs. perfect lateral mass
redistribution, described by the convection-dispersion
equation (CDE). A Br- transport experiment performed in six
zero-tension lysimeters and in the field for almost 3 yr
under atmospheric conditions. Sampling the field was
performed by extracting soil cores during seven campaigns.
According to time-domain reflectometry only slight
variations in water content were measured in space and time
in the lysimeters. In contrast, water was lower and more
variable in the plow layer in the field. The variance of
solute spreading was better predicted by the CDE assuming
perfect lateral mass redistribution. This hints at the
importance of molecular diffusion. Both have the flexibility
to fit the flux-averaged breakthrough curve in the
lysimeters and the averaged concentration profiles in the
field, but not with one set of parameters. The CLT
parameters obtained from the lysimeter experiment better
predicted the measured concentration profiles in the field
for shorter times, but both models failed for longer Due to
the occurrence of local saturation at the lower boundary of
zero-potential lysimeters, differences in water hamper the
transferability of transport parameters from lysimeters to
the field.},
keywords = {J (WoSType)},
cin = {ICG-4 / JARA-HPC},
ddc = {550},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)VDB793 / $I:(DE-82)080012_20140620$},
pnm = {Terrestrische Umwelt},
pid = {G:(DE-Juel1)FUEK407},
shelfmark = {Environmental Sciences / Soil Science / Water Resources},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
UT = {WOS:000268871900016},
doi = {10.2136/vzj2008.0024},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/5525},
}