% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Lambot:5533,
author = {Lambot, S. and Slob, E. C. and Rhebergen, J. and Lopera, O.
and Jadoon, K. Z. and Vereecken, H.},
title = {{R}emote {E}stimation of the {H}ydraulic {P}roperties of a
{S}and {U}sing {F}ull-{W}aveform {I}ntegrated
{H}ydrogeophysical {I}nversion of {T}ime-{L}apse,
{O}ff-{G}round {GPR} {D}ata},
journal = {Vadose zone journal},
volume = {8},
issn = {1539-1663},
address = {Madison, Wis.},
publisher = {SSSA},
reportid = {PreJuSER-5533},
pages = {743 - 754},
year = {2009},
note = {This research was supported by a Marie Curie Intra-European
Fellowships within the 6th European Community Framework
Program (SENSOIL project no. 502116), Delft University of
Technology (TUDelft, The Netherlands), the TNO Defense,
Security and Safety (The Netherlands), the Universite
catholique de Louvain and Fonds National de la Recherche
Scientifique (UCL and FNRS, Belgium), and the
Forschungszentrum Julich (Germany). The authors are grateful
to David Robinson and three anonymous reviewers for their
constructive comments.},
abstract = {We used integrated hydrogeophysical inversion of
time-lapse, proximal ground penetrating radar (GPR) data to
remotely the unsaturated soil hydraulic properties of a
laboratory sand during an infiltration event. The inversion
procedure involved full-waveform modeling of the radar
signal and one-dimensional, vertical flow modeling. We
combined radar model with HYDRUS-1D. The radar system was
set up using standard, handheld vector network analyzer
Significant effects of water dynamics were observed on the
time-lapse radar data. The estimated hydraulic were
relatively consistent with direct characterization of
undisturbed sand samples. Significant differences
particularly observed for the saturated hydraulic
conductivity, which was underestimated by two orders of
magnitude. Nevertheless, the use of soil hydraulic
parameters derived from reference measurements failed to
correctly water dynamics, whereas GPR-based predictions
captured some of the major features of time domain
reflectometry measurements and better agreed with visual
observations. These results suggest that the proposed method
promising for noninvasive, effective hydraulic
characterization of the shallow subsurface and hence,
monitoring of dynamics at the field scale.},
keywords = {J (WoSType)},
cin = {ICG-4 / JARA-HPC},
ddc = {550},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)VDB793 / $I:(DE-82)080012_20140620$},
pnm = {Terrestrische Umwelt},
pid = {G:(DE-Juel1)FUEK407},
shelfmark = {Environmental Sciences / Soil Science / Water Resources},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
UT = {WOS:000268871900021},
doi = {10.2136/vzj2008.0058},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/5533},
}