% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Weihermller:5537,
author = {Weihermüller, L. and Huisman, J. A. and Graf, A. and
Herbst, M. and Séquaris, J.-M.},
title = {{M}ultistep {O}utflow {E}xperiments to {D}etermine {S}oil
{P}hysical and {C}arbon {D}ioxide {P}roduction {P}arameters},
journal = {Vadose zone journal},
volume = {8},
issn = {1539-1663},
address = {Madison, Wis.},
publisher = {SSSA},
reportid = {PreJuSER-5537},
pages = {772 - 782},
year = {2009},
note = {We want to thank H. Hardelauf for the implementation of all
necessary features into the SOILCO2-RothC code. We also want
to thank C. Walraf for the C-pool fractionation and T.
Schuster for his helpful hands during the experimental
setup. This research was supported by the German Research
Foundation DFG (Transregional Collaborative Research Centre
32-Patterns in Soil-Vegetation-Atmosphere Systems:
Monitoring, Modelling, and Data Assimilation).},
abstract = {Soil water content (SWC) plays a crucial role in the
production and transport of CO2 in soils. Classical
approaches estimating the effects of SWC on soil respiration
are incubation experiments, where soil structure is
disturbed and processes are neglected. Nevertheless, such
data govern the water reduction function of C turnover
models. our approach, the water reduction control parameters
(WRCP) of a water reduction function were estimated from
experiments using inverse modeling. Therefore, we used the
SOILCO2-RothC model in combination with multistep outflow
(MSO) experiments. First, the effective hydraulic properties
were estimated and then used in a second to estimate the
WRCP and rate constants of the resistant plant material
(RPM) C pool. The results showed the estimated hydraulic
parameters can be used for the prediction of CO2 production
and transport of a second experiment only if the WRCP and
the C turnover rate of the RPM pool of RothC will also be
optimized. Optimizing the WRCP matched the CO2 efflux fairly
well but the WRCP at the highest matric potential, which
determines the of reduction, was too low at -1.61 cm and
(water-filled pore space [WFPS] = $99.9\%).$ Calibrating
both WRCP and the rate constant matched the efflux again
fairly well and the results indicate a reduction of optimal
CO2 production water contents of 0.224 m(3) m(-3) or
$53.3\%$ WFPS. Also, the estimated RPM rate constant seems
to be in a reasonable at k(RPM) = 2.5791 x 10(-7) cm(-1).},
keywords = {J (WoSType)},
cin = {ICG-4},
ddc = {550},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)VDB793},
pnm = {Terrestrische Umwelt},
pid = {G:(DE-Juel1)FUEK407},
shelfmark = {Environmental Sciences / Soil Science / Water Resources},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
UT = {WOS:000268871900024},
doi = {10.2136/vzj2008.0041},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/5537},
}