% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Temperton:56224,
      author       = {Temperton, V. M.},
      title        = {{T}he recent double paradigm shift in restoration ecology},
      journal      = {Restoration ecology},
      volume       = {15},
      issn         = {1061-2971},
      address      = {Oxford [u.a.]},
      publisher    = {Wiley-Blackwell},
      reportid     = {PreJuSER-56224},
      pages        = {344 - 347},
      year         = {2007},
      note         = {Record converted from VDB: 12.11.2012},
      abstract     = {The fields of ecology and ecological restoration possess an
                      enormous potential for cross-fertilization of ideas and
                      information. Ecology could play a major role in informing
                      practical restoration, whereas restoration projects, often
                      situated in quite extreme environments, provide an excellent
                      opportunity to test ecological theories. Efforts to base
                      restoration on more of a scientific foundation, however,
                      have recently started gathering momentum, following the call
                      for such a link by Tony Bradshaw in 1987. On another level,
                      as we gather more experience and information from
                      restoration projects, it is becoming equally clear that
                      often neglected socioeconomic and political aspects of
                      restoration should not be forgotten in the overall approach
                      to restoration. The two paradigm shifts in ecological
                      restoration, toward more scientific foundation and better
                      inclusion of socioeconomic limits and opportunities, locate
                      restoration firmly in the transdisciplinary arena, with all
                      the concomitant challenges and opportunities. In this sense,
                      ecological restoration could be compared to the medical
                      profession, where both a sound knowledge of science and
                      human nature are a prerequisite for success in healing.},
      cin          = {ICG-3},
      ddc          = {570},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Juel1)ICG-3-20090406},
      pnm          = {Terrestrische Umwelt},
      pid          = {G:(DE-Juel1)FUEK407},
      shelfmark    = {Ecology},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      UT           = {WOS:000246625300023},
      doi          = {10.1111/j.1526-100X.2007.00222.x},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/56224},
}