000056236 001__ 56236
000056236 005__ 20180211182053.0
000056236 0247_ $$2pmid$$apmid:17374874
000056236 0247_ $$2DOI$$a10.1093/jxb/erm038
000056236 0247_ $$2WOS$$aWOS:000247208700020
000056236 037__ $$aPreJuSER-56236
000056236 041__ $$aeng
000056236 082__ $$a580
000056236 084__ $$2WoS$$aPlant Sciences
000056236 1001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aHüve, K.$$b0
000056236 245__ $$aSimultaneous growth and emission measurements demonstrate an interactive control of methanol release by leaf expansion and stomata
000056236 260__ $$aOxford$$bUniv. Press$$c2007
000056236 300__ $$a1783 - 1793
000056236 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article
000056236 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
000056236 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
000056236 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
000056236 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
000056236 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
000056236 440_0 $$03318$$aJournal of Experimental Botany$$v58$$x0022-0957$$y7
000056236 500__ $$aRecord converted from VDB: 12.11.2012
000056236 520__ $$aEmission from plants is a major source of atmospheric methanol. Growing tissues contribute most to plant-generated methanol in the atmosphere, but there is still controversy over biological and physico-chemical controls of methanol emission. Methanol as a water-soluble compound is thought to be strongly controlled by gas-phase diffusion (stomatal conductance), but growth rate can follow a different diurnal rhythm from that of stomatal conductance, and the extent to which the emission control is shared between diffusion and growth is unclear. Growth and methanol emissions from Gossypium hirsutum, Populus deltoides, and Fagus sylvatica were measured simultaneously. Methanol emission from growing leaves was several-fold higher than that from adult leaves. A pronounced diurnal rhythm of methanol emission was observed; however, this diurnal rhythm was not predominantly determined by the diurnal rhythm of leaf growth. Large methanol emission peaks in the morning when the stomata opened were observed in all species and were explained by release of methanol that had accumulated in the intercellular air space and leaf liquid pool at night in leaves with closed stomata. Cumulative daily methanol emissions were strongly correlated with the total daily leaf growth, but the diurnal rhythm of methanol emission was modified by growth rate and stomatal conductance in a complex manner. While in G. hirsutum and in F. sylvatica maxima in methanol emission and growth coincided, maximum growth rates of P. deltoides were observed at night, while maximum methanol emissions occurred in the morning. This interspecific variation was explained by differences in the share of emission control by growth processes, by stomatal conductance, and methanol solubilization in tissue water.
000056236 536__ $$0G:(DE-Juel1)FUEK407$$2G:(DE-HGF)$$aTerrestrische Umwelt$$cP24$$x0
000056236 588__ $$aDataset connected to Web of Science, Pubmed
000056236 650_2 $$2MeSH$$aCircadian Rhythm
000056236 650_2 $$2MeSH$$aFagus: growth & development
000056236 650_2 $$2MeSH$$aFagus: metabolism
000056236 650_2 $$2MeSH$$aGossypium: growth & development
000056236 650_2 $$2MeSH$$aGossypium: metabolism
000056236 650_2 $$2MeSH$$aMethanol: metabolism
000056236 650_2 $$2MeSH$$aPlant Leaves: growth & development
000056236 650_2 $$2MeSH$$aPlant Leaves: metabolism
000056236 650_2 $$2MeSH$$aPopulus: growth & development
000056236 650_2 $$2MeSH$$aPopulus: metabolism
000056236 650_2 $$2MeSH$$aSpecies Specificity
000056236 650_7 $$067-56-1$$2NLM Chemicals$$aMethanol
000056236 650_7 $$2WoSType$$aJ
000056236 65320 $$2Author$$afagus sylvatica
000056236 65320 $$2Author$$aGossypium hirsutum
000056236 65320 $$2Author$$aleaf growth
000056236 65320 $$2Author$$amethanol emission
000056236 65320 $$2Author$$aPopulus deltoides
000056236 65320 $$2Author$$astomatal conductance
000056236 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)VDB11021$$aChrist, M. M.$$b1$$uFZJ
000056236 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)129345$$aKleist, E.$$b2$$uFZJ
000056236 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)VDB56253$$aUerlings, R.$$b3$$uFZJ
000056236 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aNiinemets, Ü.$$b4
000056236 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)VDB2595$$aWalter, A.$$b5$$uFZJ
000056236 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)VDB1780$$aWildt, J.$$b6$$uFZJ
000056236 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)1466717-4$$a10.1093/jxb/erm038$$gVol. 58, p. 1783 - 1793$$p1783 - 1793$$q58<1783 - 1793$$tThe @journal of experimental botany$$v58$$x0022-0957$$y2007
000056236 8567_ $$uhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erm038
000056236 909CO $$ooai:juser.fz-juelich.de:56236$$pVDB
000056236 9131_ $$0G:(DE-Juel1)FUEK407$$bErde und Umwelt$$kP24$$lTerrestrische Umwelt$$vTerrestrische Umwelt$$x0
000056236 9141_ $$y2007
000056236 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0010$$aJCR/ISI refereed
000056236 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)ICG-3-20090406$$d31.10.2010$$gICG$$kICG-3$$lPhytosphäre$$x1
000056236 970__ $$aVDB:(DE-Juel1)88188
000056236 980__ $$aVDB
000056236 980__ $$aConvertedRecord
000056236 980__ $$ajournal
000056236 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)IBG-2-20101118
000056236 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED
000056236 981__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)IBG-2-20101118
000056236 981__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)ICG-3-20090406