% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Busch:56247,
author = {Busch, F. and Hüner, N. P. A. and Ensminger, I.},
title = {{I}ncreased air temperature during simulated autumn
conditions does not increase photosynthetic carbon gain but
affects the dissipation of excess energy in seedlings of the
evergreen conifer {J}ack {P}ine},
journal = {Plant physiology},
volume = {143},
issn = {0032-0889},
address = {Rockville, Md.: Soc.},
publisher = {JSTOR},
reportid = {PreJuSER-56247},
pages = {1242 - 1251},
year = {2007},
note = {Record converted from VDB: 12.11.2012},
abstract = {Temperature and daylength act as environmental signals that
determine the length of the growing season in boreal
evergreen conifers. Climate change might affect the seasonal
development of these trees, as they will experience
naturally decreasing daylength during autumn, while at the
same time warmer air temperature will maintain
photosynthesis and respiration. We characterized the
down-regulation of photosynthetic gas exchange and the
mechanisms involved in the dissipation of energy in Jack
pine (Pinus banksiana) in controlled environments during a
simulated summer-autumn transition under natural conditions
and conditions with altered air temperature and photoperiod.
Using a factorial design, we dissected the effects of
daylength and temperature. Control plants were grown at
either warm summer conditions with 16-h photoperiod and 22
degrees C or conditions representing a cool autumn with 8
h/7 degrees C. To assess the impact of photoperiod and
temperature on photosynthesis and energy dissipation, plants
were also grown under either cold summer (16-h photoperiod/7
degrees C) or warm autumn conditions (8-h photoperiod/22
degrees C). Photosynthetic gas exchange was affected by both
daylength and temperature. Assimilation and respiration
rates under warm autumn conditions were only about one-half
of the summer values but were similar to values obtained for
cold summer and natural autumn treatments. In contrast,
photosynthetic efficiency was largely determined by
temperature but not by daylength. Plants of different
treatments followed different strategies for dissipating
excess energy. Whereas in the warm summer treatment safe
dissipation of excess energy was facilitated via zeaxanthin,
in all other treatments dissipation of excess energy was
facilitated predominantly via increased aggregation of the
light-harvesting complex of photosystem II. These
differences were accompanied by a lower deepoxidation state
and larger amounts of beta-carotene in the warm autumn
treatment as well as by changes in the abundance of
thylakoid membrane proteins compared to the summer
condition. We conclude that photoperiod control of dormancy
in Jack pine appears to negate any potential for an
increased carbon gain associated with higher temperatures
during the autumn season.},
keywords = {Carbohydrate Metabolism / Carbon: metabolism / Carbon
Dioxide: metabolism / Chlorophyll: metabolism / Energy
Metabolism / Fluorescence / Photoperiod / Photosynthesis /
Pigments, Biological: metabolism / Pinus: growth $\&$
development / Pinus: metabolism / Saskatchewan / Seasons /
Seedling: metabolism / Temperature / Pigments, Biological
(NLM Chemicals) / Carbon Dioxide (NLM Chemicals) /
Chlorophyll (NLM Chemicals) / Carbon (NLM Chemicals) / J
(WoSType)},
cin = {ICG-3},
ddc = {580},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)ICG-3-20090406},
pnm = {Terrestrische Umwelt},
pid = {G:(DE-Juel1)FUEK407},
shelfmark = {Plant Sciences},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:17259287},
pmc = {pmc:PMC1820919},
UT = {WOS:000244757700016},
doi = {10.1104/pp.106.092312},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/56247},
}