000056260 001__ 56260
000056260 005__ 20180211183937.0
000056260 0247_ $$2pmid$$apmid:18211548
000056260 0247_ $$2DOI$$a10.1111/j.1438-8677.2007.00012.x
000056260 0247_ $$2WOS$$aWOS:000252496800007
000056260 037__ $$aPreJuSER-56260
000056260 041__ $$aeng
000056260 082__ $$a580
000056260 084__ $$2WoS$$aPlant Sciences
000056260 1001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)VDB47479$$aFolkers, A.$$b0$$uFZJ
000056260 245__ $$aMethanol emissions from deciduous tree species: dependence on temperature and light intensity
000056260 260__ $$aOxford [u.a.] :Wiley- Blackwell$$bWiley-Blackwell - STM$$c2008
000056260 300__ $$a65 - 75
000056260 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article
000056260 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
000056260 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
000056260 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
000056260 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
000056260 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
000056260 440_0 $$010981$$aPlant Biology$$v10$$x1435-8603$$y1
000056260 500__ $$aRecord converted from VDB: 12.11.2012
000056260 520__ $$aMethanol emissions from several deciduous tree species with predominantly mature leaves were measured under laboratory and field conditions. The emissions were modulated by temperature and light. Under constant light conditions in the laboratory, methanol emissions increased with leaf temperature, by up to 12% per degree. At constant temperatures, emissions doubled when light intensity (PAR) increased from darkness to 800 micromol x m(-2) x s(-1). A phenomenological description of light and temperature dependencies was derived from the laboratory measurements. This description was successfully applied to reproduce the diel cycle of methanol emissions from an English oak measured in the field. Labelling experiments with (13)CO(2) provided evidence that less than 10% of the emitted methanol was produced de novo by photosynthesis directly prior to emission. Hence, the light dependence of the emissions cannot be explained by instantaneous production from CO(2) fixation. Additional experiments with selective cooling of plant roots indicated that a substantial fraction of the emitted methanol may be produced in the roots or stem and transported to stomata by the transpiration stream. However, the transpiration stream cannot be considered as the main factor that determines methanol emissions by the investigated plants.
000056260 536__ $$0G:(DE-Juel1)FUEK407$$2G:(DE-HGF)$$aTerrestrische Umwelt$$cP24$$x0
000056260 588__ $$aDataset connected to Web of Science, Pubmed
000056260 650_2 $$2MeSH$$aCarbon Dioxide: metabolism
000056260 650_2 $$2MeSH$$aCarbon Isotopes
000056260 650_2 $$2MeSH$$aCircadian Rhythm: radiation effects
000056260 650_2 $$2MeSH$$aLight
000056260 650_2 $$2MeSH$$aMethanol: metabolism
000056260 650_2 $$2MeSH$$aPlant Roots: physiology
000056260 650_2 $$2MeSH$$aPlant Roots: radiation effects
000056260 650_2 $$2MeSH$$aPlant Transpiration: physiology
000056260 650_2 $$2MeSH$$aPlant Transpiration: radiation effects
000056260 650_2 $$2MeSH$$aQuercus: metabolism
000056260 650_2 $$2MeSH$$aQuercus: radiation effects
000056260 650_2 $$2MeSH$$aTemperature
000056260 650_7 $$00$$2NLM Chemicals$$aCarbon Isotopes
000056260 650_7 $$0124-38-9$$2NLM Chemicals$$aCarbon Dioxide
000056260 650_7 $$067-56-1$$2NLM Chemicals$$aMethanol
000056260 650_7 $$2WoSType$$aJ
000056260 65320 $$2Author$$aalgorithm
000056260 65320 $$2Author$$aC-13 labelling
000056260 65320 $$2Author$$alight dependence
000056260 65320 $$2Author$$amethanol
000056260 65320 $$2Author$$atemperature dependence
000056260 65320 $$2Author$$atranspiration
000056260 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aHüve, K.$$b1
000056260 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aAmmann, C.$$b2
000056260 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aDindorf, T.$$b3
000056260 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aKesselmeier, J.$$b4
000056260 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)129345$$aKleist, E.$$b5$$uFZJ
000056260 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aKuhn, U.$$b6
000056260 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)VDB56253$$aUerlings, R.$$b7$$uFZJ
000056260 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)VDB1780$$aWildt, J.$$b8$$uFZJ
000056260 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)2026390-9$$a10.1111/j.1438-8677.2007.00012.x$$gVol. 10, p. 65 - 75$$p65 - 75$$q10<65 - 75$$tPlant biology$$v10$$x1435-8603$$y2008
000056260 8567_ $$uhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1438-8677.2007.00012.x
000056260 909CO $$ooai:juser.fz-juelich.de:56260$$pVDB
000056260 9131_ $$0G:(DE-Juel1)FUEK407$$bErde und Umwelt$$kP24$$lTerrestrische Umwelt$$vTerrestrische Umwelt$$x0
000056260 9141_ $$y2008
000056260 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0010$$aJCR/ISI refereed
000056260 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)ICG-3-20090406$$d31.10.2010$$gICG$$kICG-3$$lPhytosphäre$$x1
000056260 970__ $$aVDB:(DE-Juel1)88223
000056260 980__ $$aVDB
000056260 980__ $$aConvertedRecord
000056260 980__ $$ajournal
000056260 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)IBG-2-20101118
000056260 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED
000056260 981__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)IBG-2-20101118
000056260 981__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)ICG-3-20090406