001     56312
005     20210812111658.0
024 7 _ |2 DOI
|a 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00754.x
024 7 _ |2 WOS
|a WOS:000229389500003
024 7 _ |2 altmetric
|a altmetric:3103641
037 _ _ |a PreJuSER-56312
041 _ _ |a ENG
082 _ _ |a 570
084 _ _ |2 WoS
|a Ecology
100 1 _ |0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|a Kunert, G.
|b 0
245 _ _ |a Alarm pheromone mediates production of winged dispersal morphs in aphids
260 _ _ |a Oxford [u.a.]
|b Wiley-Blackwell
|c 2005
300 _ _ |a 596 - 603
336 7 _ |0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
|a Journal Article
336 7 _ |2 DataCite
|a Output Types/Journal article
336 7 _ |0 0
|2 EndNote
|a Journal Article
336 7 _ |2 BibTeX
|a ARTICLE
336 7 _ |2 ORCID
|a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
336 7 _ |2 DRIVER
|a article
440 _ 0 |0 16982
|a Ecology Letters
|v 8
|x 1461-023X
500 _ _ |a Record converted from VDB: 12.11.2012
520 _ _ |a The aphid alarm pheromone (E)-β-farnesene (EBF) is the major example of defence communication in the insect world. Released when aphids are attacked by predators such as ladybirds or lacewing larvae, aphid alarm pheromone causes behavioural reactions such as walking or dropping off the host plant. In this paper, we show that the exposure to alarm pheromone also induces aphids to give birth to winged dispersal morphs that leave their host plants. We first demonstrate that the alarm pheromone is the only volatile compound emitted from aphid colonies under predator attack and that emission is proportional to predator activity. We then show that artificial alarm pheromone induces groups of aphids but not single individuals to produce a higher proportion of winged morphs among their offspring. Furthermore, aphids react more strongly to the frequency of pheromone release than the amount of pheromone delivered. We suggest that EBF leads to a ‘pseudo crowding’ effect whereby alarm pheromone perception causes increased walking behaviour in aphids resulting in an increase in the number of physical contacts between individuals, similar to what happens when aphids are crowded. As many plants also produce EBF, our finding suggests that aphids could be manipulated by plants into leaving their hosts, but they also show that the context-dependence of EBF-induced wing formation may hinder such an exploitation of intraspecific signalling by plants.
536 _ _ |0 G:(DE-Juel1)FUEK407
|2 G:(DE-HGF)
|a Terrestrische Umwelt
|c P24
|x 0
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to Web of Science, Pubmed
653 2 0 |2 Author
|a alarm pheromone
653 2 0 |2 Author
|a (E)-beta-farnesene
653 2 0 |2 Author
|a multitrophic interaction
653 2 0 |2 Author
|a pea aphid
653 2 0 |2 Author
|a wing induction
700 1 _ |0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|a Otto, S.
|b 1
700 1 _ |0 P:(DE-Juel1)VDB60908
|a Röse, U. S. R.
|b 2
|u FZJ
700 1 _ |0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|a Gershenzon, J.
|b 3
700 1 _ |0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|a Weisser, W. W.
|b 4
773 _ _ |0 PERI:(DE-600)2020195-3
|a 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00754.x
|g Vol. 8, p. 596 - 603
|p 596 - 603
|q 8<596 - 603
|t Ecology letters
|v 8
|x 1461-023X
|y 2005
856 7 _ |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00754.x
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:56312
|p VDB
913 1 _ |0 G:(DE-Juel1)FUEK407
|b Erde und Umwelt
|k P24
|l Terrestrische Umwelt
|v Terrestrische Umwelt
|x 0
914 1 _ |a Nachtrag
|y 2005
915 _ _ |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0010
|a JCR/ISI refereed
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)VDB49
|d 31.12.2006
|g ICG
|k ICG-III
|l Phytosphäre
|x 0
970 _ _ |a VDB:(DE-Juel1)88304
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a ConvertedRecord
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-2-20101118
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED
981 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-2-20101118
981 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)ICG-3-20090406


LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21