000057013 001__ 57013
000057013 005__ 20180211173548.0
000057013 0247_ $$2DOI$$a10.1002/sia.2425
000057013 0247_ $$2WOS$$aWOS:000243303500019
000057013 037__ $$aPreJuSER-57013
000057013 041__ $$aeng
000057013 082__ $$a540
000057013 084__ $$2WoS$$aChemistry, Physical
000057013 1001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)VDB5414$$aIbach, H.$$b0$$uFZJ
000057013 245__ $$aElectron spectrometers for inelastic scattering from magnetic surface excitations
000057013 260__ $$aChichester [u.a.]$$bWiley$$c2006
000057013 300__ $$a
000057013 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article
000057013 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
000057013 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
000057013 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
000057013 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
000057013 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
000057013 440_0 $$09281$$aSurface and Interface Analysis$$v38$$x0142-2421$$y12
000057013 500__ $$aRecord converted from VDB: 12.11.2012
000057013 520__ $$aThis paper compares the performance of two different designs for electron spectrometers to be used for inelastic scattering of spin-polarized electrons from surface magnons and Stoner excitations. The recently proposed combination of monochromators with 90 degrees and 18 degrees deflection angles ensures a maximum spin asymmetry signal while providing still a good quality of the monochromatic beam. Higher intensities, however, are obtained with the classical 146 degrees/146 degrees combination, which features a spin polarization longitudinal to the beam direction at the target. We present calculations for the monochromatic current for both combinations and argue that the use of the classical spectrometer type may be advantageous. Copyright (C) 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
000057013 536__ $$0G:(DE-Juel1)FUEK414$$2G:(DE-HGF)$$aKondensierte Materie$$cP54$$x0
000057013 588__ $$aDataset connected to Web of Science
000057013 650_7 $$2WoSType$$aJ
000057013 65320 $$2Author$$aelectron spectrometers
000057013 65320 $$2Author$$ainelastic scattering of electrons
000057013 65320 $$2Author$$amagnons
000057013 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aEtzkorn, M.$$b1
000057013 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aKirschner, J.$$b2
000057013 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)2023881-2$$a10.1002/sia.2425$$gVol. 38$$q38$$tSurface and interface analysis$$v38$$x0142-2421$$y2006
000057013 8567_ $$uhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sia.2425
000057013 909CO $$ooai:juser.fz-juelich.de:57013$$pVDB
000057013 9131_ $$0G:(DE-Juel1)FUEK414$$bMaterie$$kP54$$lKondensierte Materie$$vKondensierte Materie$$x0$$zentfällt   bis 2009
000057013 9141_ $$aNachtrag$$y2006
000057013 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0010$$aJCR/ISI refereed
000057013 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)VDB43$$d31.12.2006$$gISG$$kISG-3$$lInstitut für Grenzflächen und Vakuumtechnologien$$x1
000057013 970__ $$aVDB:(DE-Juel1)89708
000057013 980__ $$aVDB
000057013 980__ $$aConvertedRecord
000057013 980__ $$ajournal
000057013 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)PGI-3-20110106
000057013 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED
000057013 981__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)PGI-3-20110106