000057412 001__ 57412
000057412 005__ 20240712100816.0
000057412 0247_ $$2WOS$$aWOS:000247572500001
000057412 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.5194/acp-7-3055-2007
000057412 0247_ $$2Handle$$a2128/8675
000057412 0247_ $$2altmetric$$aaltmetric:14710929
000057412 037__ $$aPreJuSER-57412
000057412 041__ $$aeng
000057412 082__ $$a550
000057412 084__ $$2WoS$$aMeteorology & Atmospheric Sciences
000057412 1001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)VDB14301$$avon Hobe, M.$$b0$$uFZJ
000057412 245__ $$aUnderstanding the kinetics of the CIO dimer cycle
000057412 260__ $$aKatlenburg-Lindau$$bEGU$$c2007
000057412 300__ $$a3055 - 3069
000057412 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article
000057412 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
000057412 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
000057412 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
000057412 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
000057412 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
000057412 4001_ $$aHobe, M.
000057412 440_0 $$09601$$aAtmospheric Chemistry and Physics$$v7$$x1680-7316
000057412 500__ $$aRecord converted from VDB: 12.11.2012
000057412 520__ $$aAmong the major factors controlling ozone loss in the polar vortices in winter/spring is the kinetics of the ClO dimer catalytic cycle. Here, we propose a strategy to test and improve our understanding of these kinetics by comparing and combining information on the thermal equilibrium between ClO and Cl2O2, the rate of Cl2O2 formation, and the Cl2O2 photolysis rate from laboratory experiments, theoretical studies and field observations. Concordant with a number of earlier studies, we find considerable inconsistencies of some recent laboratory results with rate theory calculations and stratospheric observations of ClO and Cl2O2. The set of parameters for which we find the best overall consistency - namely the ClO/Cl2O2 equilibrium constant suggested by Plenge et al. ( 2005), the Cl2O2 recombination rate constant reported by Nickolaisen et al. ( 1994) and Cl2O2 photolysis rates based on absorption cross sections in the range between the JPL 2006 assessment and the laboratory study by Burkholder et al. ( 1990) - is not congruent with the latest recommendations given by the JPL and IUPAC panels and does not represent the laboratory studies currently regarded as the most reliable experimental values. We show that the incorporation of new Pope et al. ( 2007) Cl2O2 absorption cross sections into several models, combined with best estimates for other key parameters ( based on either JPL and IUPAC evaluations or on our study), results in severe model underestimates of observed ClO and observed ozone loss rates. This finding suggests either the existence of an unknown process that drives the partitioning of ClO and Cl2O2, or else some unidentified problem with either the laboratory study or numerous measurements of atmospheric ClO. Our mechanistic understanding of the ClO/Cl2O2 system is grossly lacking, with severe implications for our ability to simulate both present and future polar ozone depletion.
000057412 536__ $$0G:(DE-Juel1)FUEK406$$2G:(DE-HGF)$$aAtmosphäre und Klima$$cP22$$x0
000057412 588__ $$aDataset connected to Web of Science
000057412 650_7 $$2WoSType$$aJ
000057412 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aSalawitch, R. J.$$b1
000057412 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aCanty, T.$$b2
000057412 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aKeller-Rudek, H.$$b3
000057412 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aMoortgat, G. K.$$b4
000057412 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)129122$$aGrooß, J.-U.$$b5$$uFZJ
000057412 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)129138$$aMüller, R.$$b6$$uFZJ
000057412 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)129158$$aStroh, F.$$b7$$uFZJ
000057412 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)2069847-1$$a10.5194/acp-7-3055-2007$$gVol. 7, p. 3055 - 3069$$p3055 - 3069$$q7<3055 - 3069$$tAtmospheric chemistry and physics$$v7$$x1680-7316$$y2007
000057412 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/57412/files/acp-7-3055-2007.pdf$$yOpenAccess
000057412 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/57412/files/acp-7-3055-2007.gif?subformat=icon$$xicon$$yOpenAccess
000057412 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/57412/files/acp-7-3055-2007.jpg?subformat=icon-180$$xicon-180$$yOpenAccess
000057412 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/57412/files/acp-7-3055-2007.jpg?subformat=icon-700$$xicon-700$$yOpenAccess
000057412 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/57412/files/acp-7-3055-2007.pdf?subformat=pdfa$$xpdfa$$yOpenAccess
000057412 909CO $$ooai:juser.fz-juelich.de:57412$$pdnbdelivery$$pVDB$$pdriver$$popen_access$$popenaire
000057412 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0010$$aJCR/ISI refereed
000057412 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0510$$aOpenAccess
000057412 915__ $$0LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBYNCSA2$$2HGFVOC$$aCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike CC BY-NC-SA 2.0
000057412 9141_ $$y2007
000057412 9131_ $$0G:(DE-Juel1)FUEK406$$bUmwelt$$kP22$$lAtmosphäre und Klima$$vAtmosphäre und Klima$$x0$$zfortgesetzt als P23
000057412 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)VDB790$$d30.09.2010$$gICG$$kICG-1$$lStratosphäre$$x1
000057412 970__ $$aVDB:(DE-Juel1)90259
000057412 9801_ $$aFullTexts
000057412 980__ $$aFullTexts
000057412 980__ $$aConvertedRecord
000057412 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)IEK-7-20101013
000057412 980__ $$ajournal
000057412 980__ $$aVDB
000057412 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED
000057412 981__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)ICE-4-20101013
000057412 981__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)IEK-7-20101013