guest ::
| Home > Publications database > Nitrogen and sulfur deposition on regional and global scales: A multimodel evaluation > print |
| Home > Publications database > Nitrogen and sulfur deposition on regional and global scales: A multimodel evaluation > print |
| 001 | 57797 | ||
| 005 | 20240712100958.0 | ||
| 024 | 7 | _ | |a 10.1029/2005GB002672 |2 DOI |
| 024 | 7 | _ | |a WOS:000241700200001 |2 WOS |
| 024 | 7 | _ | |a 2128/20714 |2 Handle |
| 024 | 7 | _ | |a altmetric:2627353 |2 altmetric |
| 037 | _ | _ | |a PreJuSER-57797 |
| 041 | _ | _ | |a eng |
| 082 | _ | _ | |a 550 |
| 084 | _ | _ | |2 WoS |a Environmental Sciences |
| 084 | _ | _ | |2 WoS |a Geosciences, Multidisciplinary |
| 084 | _ | _ | |2 WoS |a Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences |
| 100 | 1 | _ | |a Dentener, F. |b 0 |0 P:(DE-HGF)0 |
| 245 | _ | _ | |a Nitrogen and sulfur deposition on regional and global scales: A multimodel evaluation |
| 260 | _ | _ | |a Washington, DC |b AGU |c 2006 |
| 300 | _ | _ | |a GB4003 |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a Journal Article |0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16 |2 PUB:(DE-HGF) |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a Output Types/Journal article |2 DataCite |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a Journal Article |0 0 |2 EndNote |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a ARTICLE |2 BibTeX |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE |2 ORCID |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a article |2 DRIVER |
| 440 | _ | 0 | |a Global Biochemical Cycles |0 18183 |y 4 |v 20 |
| 500 | _ | _ | |a Record converted from VDB: 12.11.2012 |
| 520 | _ | _ | |a [1] We use 23 atmospheric chemistry transport models to calculate current and future (2030) deposition of reactive nitrogen (NOy, NHx) and sulfate (SOx) to land and ocean surfaces. The models are driven by three emission scenarios: ( 1) current air quality legislation (CLE); ( 2) an optimistic case of the maximum emissions reductions currently technologically feasible ( MFR); and ( 3) the contrasting pessimistic IPCC SRES A2 scenario. An extensive evaluation of the present-day deposition using nearly all information on wet deposition available worldwide shows a good agreement with observations in Europe and North America, where 60 - 70% of the model-calculated wet deposition rates agree to within +/- 50% with quality-controlled measurements. Models systematically overestimate NHx deposition in South Asia, and underestimate NOy deposition in East Asia. We show that there are substantial differences among models for the removal mechanisms of NOy, NHx, and SOx, leading to +/- 1 sigma variance in total deposition fluxes of about 30% in the anthropogenic emissions regions, and up to a factor of 2 outside. In all cases the mean model constructed from the ensemble calculations is among the best when comparing to measurements. Currently, 36 - 51% of all NOy, NHx, and SOx is deposited over the ocean, and 50 - 80% of the fraction of deposition on land falls on natural (nonagricultural) vegetation. Currently, 11% of the world's natural vegetation receives nitrogen deposition in excess of the "critical load'' threshold of 1000 mg(N) m(-2) yr(-1). The regions most affected are the United States (20% of vegetation), western Europe ( 30%), eastern Europe ( 80%), South Asia (60%), East Asia 40%), southeast Asia (30%), and Japan (50%). Future deposition fluxes are mainly driven by changes in emissions, and less importantly by changes in atmospheric chemistry and climate. The global fraction of vegetation exposed to nitrogen loads in excess of 1000 mg(N) m(-2) yr(-1) increases globally to 17% for CLE and 25% for A2. In MFR, the reductions in NOy are offset by further increases for NHx deposition. The regions most affected by exceedingly high nitrogen loads for CLE and A2 are Europe and Asia, but also parts of Africa. |
| 536 | _ | _ | |a Atmosphäre und Klima |c P22 |2 G:(DE-HGF) |0 G:(DE-Juel1)FUEK406 |x 0 |
| 588 | _ | _ | |a Dataset connected to Web of Science |
| 650 | _ | 7 | |a J |2 WoSType |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Drevet, J. |b 1 |0 P:(DE-HGF)0 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Lamarque, J. F. |b 2 |0 P:(DE-HGF)0 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Bey, I. |b 3 |0 P:(DE-HGF)0 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Eickhout, B. |b 4 |0 P:(DE-HGF)0 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Fiore, A. M. |b 5 |0 P:(DE-HGF)0 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Hauglustaine, D. |b 6 |0 P:(DE-HGF)0 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Horowitz, L. W. |b 7 |0 P:(DE-HGF)0 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Krol, M. |b 8 |0 P:(DE-HGF)0 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Kulshrestha, U.C. |b 9 |0 P:(DE-HGF)0 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Lawrence, M. |b 10 |0 P:(DE-HGF)0 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Galy-Lacaux, C. |b 11 |0 P:(DE-HGF)0 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Rast, S. |b 12 |0 P:(DE-HGF)0 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Shindell, D. |b 13 |0 P:(DE-HGF)0 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Stevenson, D. |b 14 |0 P:(DE-HGF)0 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Van Noije, T. |b 15 |0 P:(DE-HGF)0 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Atherton, C. |b 16 |0 P:(DE-HGF)0 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Bell, N. |b 17 |0 P:(DE-HGF)0 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Bergmann, D. |b 18 |0 P:(DE-HGF)0 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Butler, T. |b 19 |0 P:(DE-HGF)0 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Cofala, J. |b 20 |0 P:(DE-HGF)0 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Collins, B. |b 21 |0 P:(DE-HGF)0 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Doherty, R. |b 22 |0 P:(DE-HGF)0 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Ellingsen, K. |b 23 |0 P:(DE-HGF)0 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Galloway, J. |b 24 |0 P:(DE-HGF)0 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Gauss, M. |b 25 |0 P:(DE-HGF)0 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Montanaro, V. |b 26 |0 P:(DE-HGF)0 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Müller, J. F. |b 27 |0 P:(DE-HGF)0 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Pitari, G. |b 28 |0 P:(DE-HGF)0 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Rodriguez, J. |b 29 |0 P:(DE-HGF)0 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Sanderson, M. |b 30 |0 P:(DE-HGF)0 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Solmon, F. |b 31 |0 P:(DE-HGF)0 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Strahan, S. |b 32 |0 P:(DE-HGF)0 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Schultz, M. |b 33 |u FZJ |0 P:(DE-Juel1)6952 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Sudo, K. |b 34 |0 P:(DE-HGF)0 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Szopa, S. |b 35 |0 P:(DE-HGF)0 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Wild, O. |b 36 |0 P:(DE-HGF)0 |
| 773 | _ | _ | |a 10.1029/2005GB002672 |g Vol. 20, p. GB4003 |p GB4003 |q 20 |t Global biogeochemical cycles |v 20 |y 2006 |x 0886-6236 |
| 856 | 7 | _ | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2005GB002672 |
| 856 | 4 | _ | |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/57797/files/2005GB002672.pdf |y OpenAccess |
| 856 | 4 | _ | |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/57797/files/2005GB002672.pdf?subformat=pdfa |x pdfa |y OpenAccess |
| 909 | C | O | |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:57797 |p openaire |p open_access |p VDB |p driver |p dnbdelivery |
| 913 | 1 | _ | |k P22 |v Atmosphäre und Klima |l Atmosphäre und Klima |b Umwelt |z fortgesetzt als P23 |0 G:(DE-Juel1)FUEK406 |x 0 |
| 914 | 1 | _ | |a Nachtrag |y 2006 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150 |2 StatID |b Web of Science Core Collection |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a JCR |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100 |2 StatID |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a WoS |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0111 |2 StatID |b Science Citation Index Expanded |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a OpenAccess |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0510 |2 StatID |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a Peer review unknown |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0040 |2 StatID |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199 |2 StatID |b Thomson Reuters Master Journal List |
| 920 | 1 | _ | |k ICG-2 |l Troposphäre |d 30.09.2010 |g ICG |0 I:(DE-Juel1)VDB791 |x 1 |
| 970 | _ | _ | |a VDB:(DE-Juel1)90901 |
| 980 | 1 | _ | |a FullTexts |
| 980 | _ | _ | |a VDB |
| 980 | _ | _ | |a ConvertedRecord |
| 980 | _ | _ | |a journal |
| 980 | _ | _ | |a I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-8-20101013 |
| 980 | _ | _ | |a UNRESTRICTED |
| 981 | _ | _ | |a I:(DE-Juel1)ICE-3-20101013 |
| 981 | _ | _ | |a I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-8-20101013 |
| Library | Collection | CLSMajor | CLSMinor | Language | Author |
|---|