000057798 001__ 57798
000057798 005__ 20240712100958.0
000057798 0247_ $$2DOI$$a10.1029/2006JD007137
000057798 0247_ $$2WOS$$aWOS:000244899100002
000057798 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a0141-8637
000057798 0247_ $$2Handle$$a2128/20419
000057798 0247_ $$2altmetric$$aaltmetric:20974899
000057798 037__ $$aPreJuSER-57798
000057798 041__ $$aeng
000057798 082__ $$a550
000057798 084__ $$2WoS$$aMeteorology & Atmospheric Sciences
000057798 1001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aAuvray, M.$$b0
000057798 245__ $$aA model investigation of the impact of long-range transport on tropospheric ozone chemical tendencies
000057798 260__ $$aWashington, DC$$bUnion$$c2007
000057798 300__ $$aD05304
000057798 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article
000057798 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
000057798 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
000057798 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
000057798 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
000057798 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
000057798 440_0 $$06393$$aJournal of Geophysical Research D: Atmospheres$$v112$$x0148-0227$$yD5
000057798 500__ $$aRecord converted from VDB: 12.11.2012
000057798 520__ $$aThe impact of continental outflow on the ozone chemical tendencies (i.e., production and loss rates) is quantified in the North Atlantic and northwest Pacific regions using the GEOS-Chem and the MOZECH global models of chemistry and transport. The ozone tendencies simulated by these global models are compared to box model simulations constrained by observations in different regions and seasons. The two global models generally capture the seasonal and regional variations of the ozone tendencies. The largest discrepancies between the ozone tendencies from the box model and those from the global models are found in the lower troposphere of the eastern North Atlantic during the ACSOE campaign and are attributed to differences between chemical schemes and too strong NOx concentrations in the global models. The background and plume (i.e., impacted by continental outflow) environments are differentiated over the oceanic areas using criteria based on simulated daily mean CO concentrations. The ozone tendencies in the plume environment differ from that in the background over the entire column in North Atlantic and northwest Pacific at all seasons. According to the models, net ozone production is enhanced by 2 to 6 ppbv/day in the boundary layer and by 1 to 3 ppbv/ day in the upper troposphere, whereas the effect of pollution ranges from -1 ppbv/day to +1 ppbv/day in the middle troposphere (3-7 km), depending on the model used. The different responses of the two models are determined by differences in the water vapor distributions relative to those of pollutants in the plumes. In particular, GEOS-Chem tends to transport pollution in a drier sector of cyclones than MOZECH.
000057798 536__ $$0G:(DE-Juel1)FUEK406$$2G:(DE-HGF)$$aAtmosphäre und Klima$$cP22$$x0
000057798 588__ $$aDataset connected to Web of Science
000057798 650_7 $$2WoSType$$aJ
000057798 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aBey, I.$$b1
000057798 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aLlull, E.$$b2
000057798 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)6952$$aSchultz, M. G.$$b3$$uFZJ
000057798 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aRast, S.$$b4
000057798 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)2016800-7 $$a10.1029/2006JD007137$$gVol. 112, p. D05304$$pD05304$$q112<D05304$$tJournal of geophysical research / Atmospheres  $$tJournal of Geophysical Research$$v112$$x0148-0227$$y2007
000057798 8567_ $$uhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007137
000057798 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/57798/files/2006JD007137.pdf$$yOpenAccess
000057798 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/57798/files/2006JD007137.pdf?subformat=pdfa$$xpdfa$$yOpenAccess
000057798 909CO $$ooai:juser.fz-juelich.de:57798$$pdnbdelivery$$pdriver$$pVDB$$popen_access$$popenaire
000057798 9131_ $$0G:(DE-Juel1)FUEK406$$bUmwelt$$kP22$$lAtmosphäre und Klima$$vAtmosphäre und Klima$$x0$$zfortgesetzt als P23
000057798 9141_ $$y2007
000057798 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0150$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bWeb of Science Core Collection
000057798 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0100$$2StatID$$aJCR
000057798 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0111$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index Expanded
000057798 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0510$$2StatID$$aOpenAccess
000057798 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0010$$2StatID$$aJCR/ISI refereed
000057798 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0030$$2StatID$$aPeer review
000057798 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0199$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bThomson Reuters Master Journal List
000057798 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)VDB791$$d30.09.2010$$gICG$$kICG-2$$lTroposphäre$$x1
000057798 970__ $$aVDB:(DE-Juel1)90905
000057798 9801_ $$aFullTexts
000057798 980__ $$aVDB
000057798 980__ $$aConvertedRecord
000057798 980__ $$ajournal
000057798 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)IEK-8-20101013
000057798 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED
000057798 981__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)ICE-3-20101013
000057798 981__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)IEK-8-20101013