001     57841
005     20240708133523.0
024 7 _ |2 DOI
|a 10.1016/j.fusengdes.2005.07.017
024 7 _ |2 WOS
|a WOS:000235599500029
037 _ _ |a PreJuSER-57841
041 _ _ |a eng
082 _ _ |a 620
084 _ _ |2 WoS
|a Nuclear Science & Technology
100 1 _ |a Lipa, M.
|b 0
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
245 _ _ |a Analyses of metallic first mirror samples after long term plasma exposure in Tore Supra
260 _ _ |a New York, NY [u.a.]
|b Elsevier
|c 2006
300 _ _ |a
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
440 _ 0 |a Fusion Engineering and Design
|x 0920-3796
|0 2169
|y 1
|v 81
500 _ _ |a Record converted from VDB: 12.11.2012
520 _ _ |a Metallic mirrors are foreseen in ITER diagnostic systems as optical elements directly viewing the plasma radiation. In the frame of an EFDA contract, metallic mirror samples have been exposed for long pulse plasma discharges in Tore Supra (TS) in order to investigate surface modifications caused by erosion and re-deposition processes. Three different materials have been selected: mono-crystalline molybdenum (mc-Mo), polycrystalline stainless steel (SS) and copper (Cu). The mc-Mo samples showed after TS exposure almost no surface roughness modifications and the lowest net-erosion. A slight reflectivity reduction, most pronounced in the near UV, is attributed to light absorption in a thin carbon deposit. Cu mirrors showed by far the highest surface roughness, erosion and diffusive reflectivity. Comparative laboratory glow discharge experiments with virgin reference samples and numerical simulations of erosion/deposition confirm the dominant contribution of conditioning procedures to erosion of mirrors exposed (without shutter protection) in Tore Supra. (c) 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
536 _ _ |a Fusion
|c P13
|2 G:(DE-HGF)
|0 G:(DE-Juel1)FUEK403
|x 0
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to Web of Science
650 _ 7 |a J
|2 WoSType
653 2 0 |2 Author
|a first mirrors
653 2 0 |2 Author
|a mirror erosion and re-deposition
653 2 0 |2 Author
|a Tore Supra mirror exposure
700 1 _ |a Schunke, B.
|b 1
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
700 1 _ |a Gil, Ch.
|b 2
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
700 1 _ |a Bucalossi, J.
|b 3
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
700 1 _ |a Voitsenya, V. S.
|b 4
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
700 1 _ |a Konovalov, V.
|b 5
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
700 1 _ |a Vukolov, K.
|b 6
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
700 1 _ |a Balden, M.
|b 7
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
700 1 _ |a De Temmerman, G.
|b 8
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
700 1 _ |a Oelhafen, P.
|b 9
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
700 1 _ |a Litnovsky, A.
|b 10
|u FZJ
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)130090
700 1 _ |a Wienhold, P.
|b 11
|u FZJ
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)VDB3190
773 _ _ |a 10.1016/j.fusengdes.2005.07.017
|g Vol. 81
|q 81
|0 PERI:(DE-600)1492280-0
|t Fusion engineering and design
|v 81
|y 2006
|x 0920-3796
856 7 _ |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fusengdes.2005.07.017
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:57841
|p VDB
913 1 _ |k P13
|v Fusion
|l Fusion
|b Energie
|0 G:(DE-Juel1)FUEK403
|x 0
914 1 _ |a Nachtrag
|y 2006
915 _ _ |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0010
|a JCR/ISI refereed
920 1 _ |k IPP
|l Institut für Plasmaphysik
|d 31.12.2006
|g IPP
|0 I:(DE-Juel1)VDB181
|x 1
970 _ _ |a VDB:(DE-Juel1)90967
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a ConvertedRecord
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-4-20101013
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED
981 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IFN-1-20101013
981 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-4-20101013


LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21