% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Robinson:5926,
author = {Robinson, D.A. and Lebron, I. and Vereecken, H.},
title = {{O}n the {D}efinition of the {N}atural {C}apital of
{S}oils: {A} {F}ramework for {D}escription, {E}valutation,
and {M}onitoring},
journal = {Soil Science Society of America journal},
volume = {73},
issn = {0361-5995},
address = {Madison, Wis.},
publisher = {SSSA},
reportid = {PreJuSER-5926},
pages = {1904 - 1911},
year = {2009},
note = {The authors acknowledge the Don and Berry Kirkham fund for
supporting the Kirkham conference, allowing for the free
flow of ideas between researchers concerned with soils
research.},
abstract = {The unknown consequences and potential impacts of mankind's
ability to destroy, alter, or manipulate ecosystems on a
vast scale drives our need to better understand the earth
system. A fundamental challenge for soil science in the 21st
century is to understand the role of soil processes in
relation to the function of the earth system. The rationale
for developing a definition of sod natural capital stems
from the premise that we value 'things' based on their
perceived value to human well-being. As a consequence,
ignorance of the value of a resource, or system, may lead to
its neglect and omission from decision making. Therefore,
there is a need to develop a definition of soil natural
capital, fitting within a broad framework, which can be used
to assess soil ecosystem services that contribute to the
function of the earth system. Though various definitions of
soil natural capital have been proposed, mostly in the
agricultural context, it still remains a nebulous and
ill-defined term. The objective of this paper is to develop
an embracing definition of soil 'natural capital' focusing
on (i) mass, (ii) energy, and (iii) organization/entropy.
Mass is further subdivided into solid, liquid and gas
phases, and organization into physicochemical, biotic, and
spatiotemporal structure. We differentiate between two
aspects of capital, the quantity and the quality. As a
result of our definition, soil moisture, temperature, and
structure emerge as valuable stocks, alongside the more
traditionally viewed stocks such as inorganic (mineralogy,
texture) and organic materials (OM content). We go on to
demonstrate how natural capital fits within the ecosystem
services framework, and how using integrated valuation and
process based models it can be evaluated. Finally we discuss
measurement and monitoring needs that fit with this vision
of evaluation.},
keywords = {J (WoSType)},
cin = {ICG-4},
ddc = {550},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)VDB793},
pnm = {Terrestrische Umwelt},
pid = {G:(DE-Juel1)FUEK407},
shelfmark = {Soil Science},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
UT = {WOS:000271752700018},
doi = {10.2136/ssaj2008.0332},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/5926},
}