% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Choi:59298,
      author       = {Choi, Y.D. and Temperton, V. M. and Allen, E. B. and
                      Grootjans, A. P. and Halassy, M. and Hobbs, R. J. and Naeth,
                      M. A. and Torok, K.},
      title        = {{E}cological restoration for future sustainability in a
                      changing environment},
      journal      = {Ecoscience},
      volume       = {15},
      issn         = {1195-6860},
      address      = {Sainte-Foy},
      publisher    = {Université Laval},
      reportid     = {PreJuSER-59298},
      pages        = {53 - 64},
      year         = {2008},
      note         = {Record converted from VDB: 12.11.2012},
      comment      = {Ecoscience 15 (2008) 1, 53 - 64},
      booktitle     = {Ecoscience 15 (2008) 1, 53 - 64},
      abstract     = {Since its emergence in the past decades, restoration
                      ecology has demonstrated an astounding growth as a new
                      discipline of applied science. At the same time, this young
                      discipline has been criticized for its retrospective goals
                      largely based on the past, its fragmented approach, and its
                      idealistic goals, which do not relate to the real world
                      context. Restoration with past-focused, idealistic, and/or
                      ad hoc goals may not work in the future because an ecosystem
                      that is restored for the past environment is not likely to
                      be sustainable in the changing environment of the future,
                      simple recomposition of isolated and fragmented naturalistic
                      patches is not likely to restore ecosystem functions, and
                      unrealistic goals and work plans are not likely to gain
                      public support. We advocate directing the principles and
                      practice of ecological restoration to the future.
                      Future-aimed restoration should acknowledge the changing and
                      unpredictable environment of the future, assume the dynamic
                      nature of ecological communities with multiple trajectories,
                      and connect landscape elements for improving ecosystem
                      functions and structures. In this paper, we discuss the
                      predictability of restoration trajectories under changing
                      environmental conditions, the application of ecological
                      theories to restoration practice, the importance of
                      interdisciplinary approaches and human interventions in
                      ecosystem recovery, and the social context of ecological
                      restoration.},
      keywords     = {J (WoSType)},
      cin          = {ICG-3},
      ddc          = {570},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Juel1)ICG-3-20090406},
      pnm          = {Terrestrische Umwelt},
      pid          = {G:(DE-Juel1)FUEK407},
      shelfmark    = {Ecology},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      UT           = {WOS:000254728300007},
      doi          = {10.2980/1195-6860(2008)15[53:ERFFSI]2.0.CO;2},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/59298},
}