% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Daler:59299,
author = {Daßler, A. and Roscher, C. and Temperton, V. M. and
Schumacher, J. and Schulze, E.-D.},
title = {{A}daptive survival mechanisms and growth limitations of
small-stature herb species across a plant diversity
gradient},
journal = {Plant biology},
volume = {10},
issn = {1435-8603},
address = {Oxford [u.a.] :Wiley- Blackwell},
publisher = {Wiley-Blackwell - STM},
reportid = {PreJuSER-59299},
pages = {573 - 587},
year = {2008},
note = {Record converted from VDB: 12.11.2012},
abstract = {Several biodiversity experiments have shown positive
effects of species richness on aboveground biomass
production, but highly variable responses of individual
species. The well-known fact that the competitive ability of
plant species depends on size differences among species,
raises the question of effects of community species richness
on small-stature subordinate species. We used experimental
grasslands differing in species richness (1-60 species) and
functional group richness (one to four functional groups) to
study biodiversity effects on biomass production and
ecophysiological traits of five small-stature herbs (Bellis
perennis, Plantago media, Glechoma hederacea, Ranunculus
repens and Veronica chamaedrys). We found that
ecophysiological adaptations, known as typical
shade-tolerance strategies, played an important role with
increasing species richness and in relation to a decrease in
transmitted light. Specific leaf area and leaf area ratio
increased, while area-based leaf nitrogen decreased with
increasing community species richness. Community species
richness did not affect daily leaf carbohydrate turnover of
V. chamaedrys and P. media indicating that these species
maintained efficiency of photosynthesis even in low-light
environments. This suggests an important possible mechanism
of complementarity in such grasslands, whereby smaller
species contribute to a better overall efficiency of light
use. Nevertheless, these species rarely contributed a large
proportion to community biomass production or achieved
higher yields in mixtures than expected from monocultures.
It seems likely that the allocation to aboveground plant
organs to optimise carbon assimilation limited the
investment in belowground organs to acquire nutrients and
thus hindered these species from increasing their
performance in multi-species mixtures.},
keywords = {Angiosperms: growth $\&$ development / Angiosperms:
physiology / Biomass / Carbohydrate Metabolism / Ecosystem /
Fabaceae: growth $\&$ development / Germany / Light /
Nitrogen: metabolism / Phenotype / Plant Leaves: growth $\&$
development / Plant Leaves: metabolism / Plant Shoots:
growth $\&$ development / Nitrogen (NLM Chemicals) / J
(WoSType)},
cin = {ICG-3},
ddc = {580},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)ICG-3-20090406},
pnm = {Terrestrische Umwelt},
pid = {G:(DE-Juel1)FUEK407},
shelfmark = {Plant Sciences},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:18761496},
UT = {WOS:000258288200006},
doi = {10.1111/j.1438-8677.2008.00073.x},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/59299},
}