000059632 001__ 59632
000059632 005__ 20240712100952.0
000059632 0247_ $$2DOI$$a10.1029/2006JD007308
000059632 0247_ $$2WOS$$aWOS:000250219000003
000059632 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a0141-8637
000059632 0247_ $$2Handle$$a2128/20395
000059632 037__ $$aPreJuSER-59632
000059632 041__ $$aeng
000059632 082__ $$a550
000059632 084__ $$2WoS$$aMeteorology & Atmospheric Sciences
000059632 1001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)16203$$aSmit, H. G. J.$$b0$$uFZJ
000059632 245__ $$aAssessment of the performance of ECC-ozonesondes under quasi-flight conditions in the environmental simulation chamber: Insights from the Jülich Ozone Sonde Intercomparison Experiment (JOSIE)
000059632 260__ $$aWashington, DC$$bUnion$$c2007
000059632 300__ $$aD19306
000059632 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article
000059632 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
000059632 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
000059632 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
000059632 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
000059632 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
000059632 440_0 $$06393$$aJournal of Geophysical Research D: Atmospheres$$v112$$x0148-0227
000059632 500__ $$aRecord converted from VDB: 12.11.2012
000059632 520__ $$a[1] Since 1996, quality assurance experiments of electrochemical concentration cell (ECC) ozonesondes of two different model types (SPC-6A and ENSCI-Z) have been conducted in the environmental simulation facility at the Research Centre Juelich within the framework of the Juelich Ozone Sonde Intercomparison Experiment (JOSIE). The experiments have shown that the performance characteristics of the two ECC-sonde types can be significantly different, even when operated under the same conditions. Particularly above 20 km the ENSCI-Z sonde tends to measure 5-10% more ozone than the SPC-6A sonde. Below 20 km the differences are 5% or less, but appear to show some differences with year of manufacture. There is a significant difference in the ozone readings when sondes of the same type are operated with different cathode sensing solutions. Testing the most commonly used sensing solutions showed that for each ECC-manufacturer type the use of 1.0% KI and full buffer gives 5% larger ozone values compared with the use of 0.5% KI and half buffer, and as much as 10% larger values compared with 2.0% KI and no buffer. For ozone sounding stations performing long term measurements this means that changing the sensing solution type or ECC-sonde type can easily introduce a change of +/- 5% or more in their records, affecting determination of ozone trends. Standardization of operating procedures for ECC-sondes yields a precision better than +/-(3-5)% and an accuracy of about +/-(5-10)% up to 30 km altitude.
000059632 536__ $$0G:(DE-Juel1)FUEK406$$2G:(DE-HGF)$$aAtmosphäre und Klima$$cP22$$x0
000059632 588__ $$aDataset connected to Web of Science
000059632 650_7 $$2WoSType$$aJ
000059632 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)VDB15509$$aStraeter, W.$$b1$$uFZJ
000059632 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aJohnson, B.$$b2
000059632 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aOltmans, S.$$b3
000059632 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aDavies, J.$$b4
000059632 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aTarasick, D. W.$$b5
000059632 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aHoegger, B.$$b6
000059632 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aStubi, R.$$b7
000059632 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aSchmidlin, F.$$b8
000059632 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aNortham, T.$$b9
000059632 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aThompson, A.$$b10
000059632 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aWitte, J.$$b11
000059632 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aBoyd, I.$$b12
000059632 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aPosny, F.$$b13
000059632 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)2016800-7 $$a10.1029/2006JD007308$$gVol. 112, p. D19306$$pD19306$$q112<D19306$$tJournal of geophysical research / Atmospheres  $$tJournal of Geophysical Research$$v112$$x0148-0227$$y2007
000059632 8567_ $$uhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007308
000059632 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/59632/files/2006JD007308.pdf$$yOpenAccess
000059632 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/59632/files/2006JD007308.pdf?subformat=pdfa$$xpdfa$$yOpenAccess
000059632 909CO $$ooai:juser.fz-juelich.de:59632$$pdnbdelivery$$pdriver$$pVDB$$popen_access$$popenaire
000059632 9131_ $$0G:(DE-Juel1)FUEK406$$bUmwelt$$kP22$$lAtmosphäre und Klima$$vAtmosphäre und Klima$$x0$$zfortgesetzt als P23
000059632 9141_ $$y2007
000059632 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0150$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bWeb of Science Core Collection
000059632 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0100$$2StatID$$aJCR
000059632 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0111$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index Expanded
000059632 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0510$$2StatID$$aOpenAccess
000059632 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0010$$2StatID$$aJCR/ISI refereed
000059632 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0030$$2StatID$$aPeer review
000059632 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0199$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bThomson Reuters Master Journal List
000059632 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)VDB791$$d30.09.2010$$gICG$$kICG-2$$lTroposphäre$$x1
000059632 970__ $$aVDB:(DE-Juel1)93748
000059632 9801_ $$aFullTexts
000059632 980__ $$aVDB
000059632 980__ $$aConvertedRecord
000059632 980__ $$ajournal
000059632 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)IEK-8-20101013
000059632 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED
000059632 981__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)ICE-3-20101013
000059632 981__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)IEK-8-20101013