001     59957
005     20180211190622.0
024 7 _ |2 pmid
|a pmid:17965376
024 7 _ |2 DOI
|a 10.2134/jeq2007.0218
024 7 _ |2 WOS
|a WOS:000250972400021
037 _ _ |a PreJuSER-59957
041 _ _ |a eng
082 _ _ |a 333.7
084 _ _ |2 WoS
|a Environmental Sciences
100 1 _ |a Weihermüller, L.
|b 0
|u FZJ
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)VDB17057
245 _ _ |a In-situ soil water extraction: A Review
260 _ _ |a Madison, Wis.
|b ASA [u.a.]
|c 2007
300 _ _ |a 1735 - 1748
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
440 _ 0 |a Journal of Environmental Quality
|x 0047-2425
|0 3300
|y 6
|v 36
500 _ _ |a Record converted from VDB: 12.11.2012
520 _ _ |a The knowledge of the composition and fluxes of vadose zone water is essential for a wide range of scientific and practical fields, including water-use management, pesticide registration, fate of xenobiotics, monitoring of disposal from mining and industries, nutrient management of agricultural and forest ecosystems, ecology, and environmental protection. Nowadays, water and solute flow can be monitored using either in situ methods or minimally invasive geophysical measurements. In situ information, however, is necessary to interpret most geophysical data sets and to determine the chemical composition of seepage water. Therefore, we present a comprehensive review of in situ soil water extraction methods to monitor solute concentration, solute transport, and to calculate mass balances in natural soils. We distinguished six different sampling devices: porous cups, porous plates, capillary wicks, pan lysimeters, resin boxes, and lysimeters. For each of the six sampling devices we discuss the basic principles, the advantages and disadvantages, and limits of data acquisition. We also give decision guidance for the selection of the appropriate sampling system. The choice of material is addressed in terms of potential contamination, filtering, and sorption of the target substances. The information provided in this review will support scientists and professionals in optimizing their experimental set-up for meeting their specific goals.
536 _ _ |a Terrestrische Umwelt
|c P24
|2 G:(DE-HGF)
|0 G:(DE-Juel1)FUEK407
|x 0
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to Web of Science, Pubmed
650 _ 2 |2 MeSH
|a Colloids
650 _ 2 |2 MeSH
|a Research Design
650 _ 2 |2 MeSH
|a Sensitivity and Specificity
650 _ 2 |2 MeSH
|a Soil
650 _ 2 |2 MeSH
|a Solutions
650 _ 2 |2 MeSH
|a Water
650 _ 7 |0 0
|2 NLM Chemicals
|a Colloids
650 _ 7 |0 0
|2 NLM Chemicals
|a Soil
650 _ 7 |0 0
|2 NLM Chemicals
|a Solutions
650 _ 7 |0 7732-18-5
|2 NLM Chemicals
|a Water
650 _ 7 |a J
|2 WoSType
700 1 _ |a Siemens, J.
|b 1
|u FZJ
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)VDB61768
700 1 _ |a Deurer, M.
|b 2
|u FZJ
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)VDB61769
700 1 _ |a Knoblauch, S.
|b 3
|u FZJ
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)VDB61770
700 1 _ |a Rupp, H.
|b 4
|u FZJ
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)VDB61306
700 1 _ |a Göttlein, A.
|b 5
|u FZJ
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)VDB487
700 1 _ |a Pütz, T.
|b 6
|u FZJ
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)VDB2346
773 _ _ |a 10.2134/jeq2007.0218
|g Vol. 36, p. 1735 - 1748
|p 1735 - 1748
|q 36<1735 - 1748
|0 PERI:(DE-600)2050469-X
|t Journal of environmental quality
|v 36
|y 2007
|x 0047-2425
856 7 _ |u http://dx.doi.org/10.2134/jeq2007.0218
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:59957
|p VDB
913 1 _ |k P24
|v Terrestrische Umwelt
|l Terrestrische Umwelt
|b Erde und Umwelt
|0 G:(DE-Juel1)FUEK407
|x 0
914 1 _ |y 2007
915 _ _ |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0010
|a JCR/ISI refereed
920 1 _ |k ICG-4
|l Agrosphäre
|d 31.10.2010
|g ICG
|0 I:(DE-Juel1)VDB793
|x 1
970 _ _ |a VDB:(DE-Juel1)94128
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a ConvertedRecord
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED
981 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118


LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21