000061060 001__ 61060
000061060 005__ 20180211162339.0
000061060 0247_ $$2DOI$$a10.1016/S0003-2670(02)00061-2
000061060 0247_ $$2WOS$$aWOS:000175752500015
000061060 037__ $$aPreJuSER-61060
000061060 041__ $$aeng
000061060 082__ $$a540
000061060 084__ $$2WoS$$aChemistry, Analytical
000061060 1001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)VDB824$$aKrachler, M.$$b0$$uFZJ
000061060 245__ $$aInter-method comparison for the determination of antimony and arsenic in peat samples
000061060 260__ $$aAmsterdam$$bElsevier Science$$c2002
000061060 300__ $$a387 - 396
000061060 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article
000061060 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
000061060 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
000061060 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
000061060 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
000061060 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
000061060 440_0 $$0360$$aAnalytica Chimica Acta$$v458$$x0003-2670
000061060 500__ $$aRecord converted from VDB: 12.11.2012
000061060 520__ $$aFour analytical approaches, based on different physical principles, for the determination of antimony (Sb) and arsenic (As) in ancient peat samples were critically evaluated: (a) open vessel digestion/hydride generation-atomic absorption spectrometry (HG-AAS), (b) closed-pressurized digestion in a microwave oven followed by sector field-inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (SF-ICP-MS), (c) digestion in a microwave autoclave and subsequent quadrupole-inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (Q-ICP-MS) measurements and (d) instrumental neutron activation analysis (E, AA). The quality control scheme applied, always included the use of adequate plant reference materials to ensure the accuracy and precision of the analytical procedures. Additionally, two internal peat reference materials were analyzed using all four analytical approaches, generally showing good agreement for both elements. Method detection limits for As and Sb provided by all procedures were approximately 5 and 2 ng g(-1) which is sufficiently low for the reliable quantification of both elements in ancient, pre-anthropoaenic peat samples. A comparison of As and Sb concentrations in a set of peat samples determined by INAA, HG-AAS and SF-ICP-MS revealed that INAA underestimated the values in a systematic manner, whereas HG-AAS and SF-ICP-MS data agreed very well. Best precision of the results was obtained by analytical procedures involving HG-AAS or Q-ICP-MS and varied from 3.6 to 4.3% and 7.1 to 7.5% for As (at about 0.5 mug g(-1)) and Sb (at about 0.1 mug g(-1)), respectively. The highest sample throughput (40 samples per run accomplished in 2h) combined with low risk of sample contamination could be realized in the high-pressure microwave autoclave. The amount of sample required by all approaches was 200 mg, except for INAA which needed at least 25 times more sample mass to achieve comparable detection limits. For the quantification of As and Sb, inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) was preferred over LNAA and HG-AAS, mainly because (a) less sample is needed and (b) As and Sb can be determined simultaneously. In addition, ICP-MS offers the possibility to measure concurrently a wide range of other elements which also are of environmental interest. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
000061060 536__ $$0G:(DE-Juel1)FUEK257$$2G:(DE-HGF)$$aChemie und Dynamik der Geo-Biosphäre$$cU01$$x0
000061060 588__ $$aDataset connected to Web of Science
000061060 650_7 $$2WoSType$$aJ
000061060 65320 $$2Author$$aantimony
000061060 65320 $$2Author$$aarsenic
000061060 65320 $$2Author$$apeat
000061060 65320 $$2Author$$adigestion
000061060 65320 $$2Author$$aHG-AAS
000061060 65320 $$2Author$$aICP-MS
000061060 65320 $$2Author$$aINAA
000061060 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)VDB350$$aEmons, H.$$b1$$uFZJ
000061060 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aBarbante, C.$$b2
000061060 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aCozzi, J. P.$$b3
000061060 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aCescon, P.$$b4
000061060 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aShotyk, W.$$b5
000061060 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)1483436-4$$a10.1016/S0003-2670(02)00061-2$$gVol. 458, p. 387 - 396$$p387 - 396$$q458<387 - 396$$tAnalytica chimica acta$$v458$$x0003-2670$$y2002
000061060 909CO $$ooai:juser.fz-juelich.de:61060$$pVDB
000061060 9131_ $$0G:(DE-Juel1)FUEK257$$bEnvironment (Umwelt)$$kU01$$lChemie und Dynamik der Geo-Biosphäre$$vChemie und Dynamik der Geo-Biosphäre$$x0
000061060 9141_ $$y2002
000061060 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0010$$aJCR/ISI refereed
000061060 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)VDB49$$d31.12.2006$$gICG$$kICG-III$$lPhytosphäre$$x0
000061060 970__ $$aVDB:(DE-Juel1)9566
000061060 980__ $$aVDB
000061060 980__ $$aConvertedRecord
000061060 980__ $$ajournal
000061060 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)IBG-2-20101118
000061060 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED
000061060 981__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)IBG-2-20101118
000061060 981__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)ICG-3-20090406