000061350 001__ 61350 000061350 005__ 20180211185151.0 000061350 0247_ $$2pmid$$apmid:9251638 000061350 0247_ $$2DOI$$a10.1007/s11119-008-9074-0 000061350 0247_ $$2WOS$$aWOS:000260961700003 000061350 037__ $$aPreJuSER-61350 000061350 041__ $$aeng 000061350 082__ $$a630 000061350 084__ $$2WoS$$aAgriculture, Multidisciplinary 000061350 1001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)129388$$aRascher, U.$$b0$$uFZJ 000061350 245__ $$aSpatio-temporal variations of photosynthesis: the potential of optical remote sensing to better understand and scale light use efficiency and stresses of plant ecosystems 000061350 260__ $$aDordrecht [u.a.]$$bSpringer Science + Business Media B.V$$c2008 000061350 300__ $$a355 - 366 000061350 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article 000061350 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article 000061350 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article 000061350 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE 000061350 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE 000061350 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle 000061350 440_0 $$019803$$aPrecision Agriculture$$v9$$x1385-2256$$y6 000061350 500__ $$aRecord converted from VDB: 12.11.2012 000061350 520__ $$aMany people in Taiwan have been living in buildings constructed with cobalt-60-contaminated steel rods. To study the biological effects of chronic low-dose ionising radiation on the residents of one such building, micronucleus formation in these individuals was compared with that in controls.The 73 residents had 77 age-and-sex-matched controls: 31 had 31 close relatives as controls (group A controls); eight of the 31 had a second set of close relatives; and the other controls were 38 residents in neighbouring buildings. Two micronucleus assays were used-a cytochalasin B (CBMN) assay and another involving incubation with cytarabine (CBMNA). Assay results are given as "frequency", or the number of binucleate cells containing one micronucleus per 1000 randomly examined binucleate cells.The CBMN and CBMNA mean (SD) frequencies for 31 exposed individuals (0.016 [0.009] and 0.025 [0.013] respectively) were greater than those for their group A controls (0.009 [0.004] and 0.016 [0.009], respectively) (p = 0.0006 and 0.0002, respectively). The mean CBMN and CBMNA frequencies for all the exposed individuals (0.017 [0.011] and 0.030 [0.014], respectively) were significantly greater than those for all controls (0.011 [0.008] and 0.019 [0.01]; p = 0.0001 for both comparisons). The ranges of the differences in CBMN or CBMNA frequencies between 31 exposed individuals and their group A controls were 0.003 to 0.020 and 0.001 to 0.032, respectively. After adjustment for age, sex, and cigarette smoking, the adjusted relative risks of micronucleus formation from radiation exposure in all 73 residents was 1.58 (95% CI 1.42-1.71; p = 0.0001) by the CBMN assay and 1.64 (1.53-1.77; p = 0.0001) by the CBMNA assay.These findings suggest that chronic low-dose and low-dose-rate gamma-ray environmental exposure may induce cytogenetic damage in human beings. 000061350 536__ $$0G:(DE-Juel1)FUEK407$$2G:(DE-HGF)$$aTerrestrische Umwelt$$cP24$$x0 000061350 588__ $$aDataset connected to Web of Science, Pubmed 000061350 650_2 $$2MeSH$$aAdolescent 000061350 650_2 $$2MeSH$$aAdult 000061350 650_2 $$2MeSH$$aCase-Control Studies 000061350 650_2 $$2MeSH$$aChild 000061350 650_2 $$2MeSH$$aChild, Preschool 000061350 650_2 $$2MeSH$$aCobalt Radioisotopes 000061350 650_2 $$2MeSH$$aConstruction Materials 000061350 650_2 $$2MeSH$$aCytarabine: radiation effects 000061350 650_2 $$2MeSH$$aCytochalasin B: radiation effects 000061350 650_2 $$2MeSH$$aEnvironmental Exposure: adverse effects 000061350 650_2 $$2MeSH$$aEnvironmental Exposure: analysis 000061350 650_2 $$2MeSH$$aFemale 000061350 650_2 $$2MeSH$$aHousing 000061350 650_2 $$2MeSH$$aHumans 000061350 650_2 $$2MeSH$$aImmunosuppressive Agents: radiation effects 000061350 650_2 $$2MeSH$$aMale 000061350 650_2 $$2MeSH$$aMicronucleus Tests 000061350 650_2 $$2MeSH$$aMiddle Aged 000061350 650_2 $$2MeSH$$aRadiation, Ionizing 000061350 650_7 $$00$$2NLM Chemicals$$aCobalt Radioisotopes 000061350 650_7 $$00$$2NLM Chemicals$$aImmunosuppressive Agents 000061350 650_7 $$0147-94-4$$2NLM Chemicals$$aCytarabine 000061350 650_7 $$014930-96-2$$2NLM Chemicals$$aCytochalasin B 000061350 650_7 $$2WoSType$$aJ 000061350 65320 $$2Author$$aPhotosynthesis 000061350 65320 $$2Author$$aOptical remote sensing 000061350 65320 $$2Author$$aPhotochemical reflectance index 000061350 65320 $$2Author$$aChlorophyll fluorescence 000061350 65320 $$2Author$$aSpatio-temporal mapping 000061350 65320 $$2Author$$aSoybean 000061350 65320 $$2Author$$aGlycine max (L 000061350 65320 $$2Author$$a) Merr 000061350 65320 $$2Author$$aAvocado 000061350 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)129379$$aPieruschka, R.$$b1$$uFZJ 000061350 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)2016333-2$$a10.1007/s11119-008-9074-0$$gVol. 9, p. 355 - 366$$p355 - 366$$q9<355 - 366$$tPrecision agriculture$$v9$$x1385-2256$$y2008 000061350 8567_ $$uhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11119-008-9074-0 000061350 909CO $$ooai:juser.fz-juelich.de:61350$$pVDB 000061350 9131_ $$0G:(DE-Juel1)FUEK407$$bErde und Umwelt$$kP24$$lTerrestrische Umwelt$$vTerrestrische Umwelt$$x0 000061350 9141_ $$y2008 000061350 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0010$$aJCR/ISI refereed 000061350 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)ICG-3-20090406$$d31.10.2010$$gICG$$kICG-3$$lPhytosphäre$$x1 000061350 970__ $$aVDB:(DE-Juel1)96380 000061350 980__ $$aVDB 000061350 980__ $$aConvertedRecord 000061350 980__ $$ajournal 000061350 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)IBG-2-20101118 000061350 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED 000061350 981__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)IBG-2-20101118 000061350 981__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)ICG-3-20090406