000062043 001__ 62043
000062043 005__ 20180211165737.0
000062043 0247_ $$2DOI$$a10.1016/j.geoderma.2008.01.026
000062043 0247_ $$2WOS$$aWOS:000257019300003
000062043 037__ $$aPreJuSER-62043
000062043 041__ $$aeng
000062043 082__ $$a550
000062043 084__ $$2WoS$$aSoil Science
000062043 1001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)VDB62716$$aBauer, J.$$b0$$uFZJ
000062043 245__ $$aSensitivity of simulated soil heterotrophic respiration to temperature and moisture reduction functions
000062043 260__ $$aAmsterdam [u.a.]$$bElsevier Science$$c2008
000062043 300__ $$a
000062043 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article
000062043 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
000062043 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
000062043 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
000062043 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
000062043 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
000062043 440_0 $$08464$$aGeoderma$$v145$$x0016-7061$$y1
000062043 500__ $$aRecord converted from VDB: 12.11.2012
000062043 520__ $$aIn this study, the influence of different soil temperature and moisture reduction functions for scaling decomposition rates of soil organic matter on the prediction of CO2 production and fluxes was analysed. For this purpose, soil temperature and moisture reduction functions of six soil carbon decomposition models (CANDY, CENTURY, DAISY, PATOIS, ROTHC, and SOILCO2) were implemented in the modified SOLLCO2-ROTHC model. As a test scenario, a respiration experiment on a silt loam in Columbia (USA) was chosen, which consists of two periods both including soil respiration measurements in a wheat stand and a subsequent bare soil period. Additionally, the dataset contains treasured soil temperature, soil moisture as well as CO2 concentrations within the soil profile. The cumulative COz fluxes simulated with different temperature reduction functions showed deviations up to 41% (1.77 t C ha(-1)) for the six-month simulation period in 1981. The influence of moisture reduction was smaller with deviations up to 2% (0.10 t C ha(-1)). A combination of corresponding temperature and moisture reduction functions resulted in the highest deviations up to 41% (1.80 t C ha(-1)). Under field conditions the sensitivity towards soil temperature reduction was 6 to 7 times higher compared to soil moisture reduction. The findings of this study show that the choice of soil temperature and soil moisture reduction functions is a crucial factor for a reliable simulation of carbon turnover. (c) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
000062043 536__ $$0G:(DE-Juel1)FUEK407$$2G:(DE-HGF)$$aTerrestrische Umwelt$$cP24$$x0
000062043 588__ $$aDataset connected to Web of Science
000062043 650_7 $$2WoSType$$aJ
000062043 65320 $$2Author$$areduction functions
000062043 65320 $$2Author$$atemperature
000062043 65320 $$2Author$$awater content
000062043 65320 $$2Author$$asensitivity
000062043 65320 $$2Author$$aCO2 fluxes
000062043 65320 $$2Author$$aSOM decomposition
000062043 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)129469$$aHerbst, M.$$b1$$uFZJ
000062043 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)129472$$aHuisman, J. A.$$b2$$uFZJ
000062043 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)VDB17057$$aWeihermüller, L.$$b3$$uFZJ
000062043 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)129549$$aVereecken, H.$$b4$$uFZJ
000062043 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)2001729-7$$a10.1016/j.geoderma.2008.01.026$$gVol. 145$$q145$$tGeoderma$$v145$$x0016-7061$$y2008
000062043 8567_ $$uhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2008.01.026
000062043 909CO $$ooai:juser.fz-juelich.de:62043$$pVDB
000062043 9131_ $$0G:(DE-Juel1)FUEK407$$bErde und Umwelt$$kP24$$lTerrestrische Umwelt$$vTerrestrische Umwelt$$x0
000062043 9141_ $$y2008
000062043 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0010$$aJCR/ISI refereed
000062043 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)VDB793$$d31.10.2010$$gICG$$kICG-4$$lAgrosphäre$$x1
000062043 9201_ $$0I:(DE-82)080011_20140620$$gJARA$$kJARA-ENERGY$$lJülich-Aachen Research Alliance - Energy$$x2
000062043 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)VDB1045$$gJARA$$kJARA-SIM$$lJülich-Aachen Research Alliance - Simulation Sciences$$x3
000062043 970__ $$aVDB:(DE-Juel1)98040
000062043 980__ $$aVDB
000062043 980__ $$aConvertedRecord
000062043 980__ $$ajournal
000062043 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118
000062043 980__ $$aI:(DE-82)080011_20140620
000062043 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)VDB1045
000062043 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED
000062043 981__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118
000062043 981__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)VDB1045
000062043 981__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)VDB1047