% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Bauer:62043,
      author       = {Bauer, J. and Herbst, M. and Huisman, J. A. and
                      Weihermüller, L. and Vereecken, H.},
      title        = {{S}ensitivity of simulated soil heterotrophic respiration
                      to temperature and moisture reduction functions},
      journal      = {Geoderma},
      volume       = {145},
      issn         = {0016-7061},
      address      = {Amsterdam [u.a.]},
      publisher    = {Elsevier Science},
      reportid     = {PreJuSER-62043},
      year         = {2008},
      note         = {Record converted from VDB: 12.11.2012},
      abstract     = {In this study, the influence of different soil temperature
                      and moisture reduction functions for scaling decomposition
                      rates of soil organic matter on the prediction of CO2
                      production and fluxes was analysed. For this purpose, soil
                      temperature and moisture reduction functions of six soil
                      carbon decomposition models (CANDY, CENTURY, DAISY, PATOIS,
                      ROTHC, and SOILCO2) were implemented in the modified
                      SOLLCO2-ROTHC model. As a test scenario, a respiration
                      experiment on a silt loam in Columbia (USA) was chosen,
                      which consists of two periods both including soil
                      respiration measurements in a wheat stand and a subsequent
                      bare soil period. Additionally, the dataset contains
                      treasured soil temperature, soil moisture as well as CO2
                      concentrations within the soil profile. The cumulative COz
                      fluxes simulated with different temperature reduction
                      functions showed deviations up to $41\%$ (1.77 t C ha(-1))
                      for the six-month simulation period in 1981. The influence
                      of moisture reduction was smaller with deviations up to
                      $2\%$ (0.10 t C ha(-1)). A combination of corresponding
                      temperature and moisture reduction functions resulted in the
                      highest deviations up to $41\%$ (1.80 t C ha(-1)). Under
                      field conditions the sensitivity towards soil temperature
                      reduction was 6 to 7 times higher compared to soil moisture
                      reduction. The findings of this study show that the choice
                      of soil temperature and soil moisture reduction functions is
                      a crucial factor for a reliable simulation of carbon
                      turnover. (c) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.},
      keywords     = {J (WoSType)},
      cin          = {ICG-4 / JARA-ENERGY / JARA-SIM},
      ddc          = {550},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Juel1)VDB793 / $I:(DE-82)080011_20140620$ /
                      I:(DE-Juel1)VDB1045},
      pnm          = {Terrestrische Umwelt},
      pid          = {G:(DE-Juel1)FUEK407},
      shelfmark    = {Soil Science},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      UT           = {WOS:000257019300003},
      doi          = {10.1016/j.geoderma.2008.01.026},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/62043},
}