001     62043
005     20180211165737.0
024 7 _ |2 DOI
|a 10.1016/j.geoderma.2008.01.026
024 7 _ |2 WOS
|a WOS:000257019300003
037 _ _ |a PreJuSER-62043
041 _ _ |a eng
082 _ _ |a 550
084 _ _ |2 WoS
|a Soil Science
100 1 _ |a Bauer, J.
|b 0
|u FZJ
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)VDB62716
245 _ _ |a Sensitivity of simulated soil heterotrophic respiration to temperature and moisture reduction functions
260 _ _ |a Amsterdam [u.a.]
|b Elsevier Science
|c 2008
300 _ _ |a
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
440 _ 0 |a Geoderma
|x 0016-7061
|0 8464
|y 1
|v 145
500 _ _ |a Record converted from VDB: 12.11.2012
520 _ _ |a In this study, the influence of different soil temperature and moisture reduction functions for scaling decomposition rates of soil organic matter on the prediction of CO2 production and fluxes was analysed. For this purpose, soil temperature and moisture reduction functions of six soil carbon decomposition models (CANDY, CENTURY, DAISY, PATOIS, ROTHC, and SOILCO2) were implemented in the modified SOLLCO2-ROTHC model. As a test scenario, a respiration experiment on a silt loam in Columbia (USA) was chosen, which consists of two periods both including soil respiration measurements in a wheat stand and a subsequent bare soil period. Additionally, the dataset contains treasured soil temperature, soil moisture as well as CO2 concentrations within the soil profile. The cumulative COz fluxes simulated with different temperature reduction functions showed deviations up to 41% (1.77 t C ha(-1)) for the six-month simulation period in 1981. The influence of moisture reduction was smaller with deviations up to 2% (0.10 t C ha(-1)). A combination of corresponding temperature and moisture reduction functions resulted in the highest deviations up to 41% (1.80 t C ha(-1)). Under field conditions the sensitivity towards soil temperature reduction was 6 to 7 times higher compared to soil moisture reduction. The findings of this study show that the choice of soil temperature and soil moisture reduction functions is a crucial factor for a reliable simulation of carbon turnover. (c) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
536 _ _ |a Terrestrische Umwelt
|c P24
|2 G:(DE-HGF)
|0 G:(DE-Juel1)FUEK407
|x 0
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to Web of Science
650 _ 7 |a J
|2 WoSType
653 2 0 |2 Author
|a reduction functions
653 2 0 |2 Author
|a temperature
653 2 0 |2 Author
|a water content
653 2 0 |2 Author
|a sensitivity
653 2 0 |2 Author
|a CO2 fluxes
653 2 0 |2 Author
|a SOM decomposition
700 1 _ |a Herbst, M.
|b 1
|u FZJ
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)129469
700 1 _ |a Huisman, J. A.
|b 2
|u FZJ
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)129472
700 1 _ |a Weihermüller, L.
|b 3
|u FZJ
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)VDB17057
700 1 _ |a Vereecken, H.
|b 4
|u FZJ
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)129549
773 _ _ |a 10.1016/j.geoderma.2008.01.026
|g Vol. 145
|q 145
|0 PERI:(DE-600)2001729-7
|t Geoderma
|v 145
|y 2008
|x 0016-7061
856 7 _ |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2008.01.026
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:62043
|p VDB
913 1 _ |k P24
|v Terrestrische Umwelt
|l Terrestrische Umwelt
|b Erde und Umwelt
|0 G:(DE-Juel1)FUEK407
|x 0
914 1 _ |y 2008
915 _ _ |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0010
|a JCR/ISI refereed
920 1 _ |d 31.10.2010
|g ICG
|k ICG-4
|l Agrosphäre
|0 I:(DE-Juel1)VDB793
|x 1
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-82)080011_20140620
|k JARA-ENERGY
|l Jülich-Aachen Research Alliance - Energy
|g JARA
|x 2
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)VDB1045
|k JARA-SIM
|l Jülich-Aachen Research Alliance - Simulation Sciences
|g JARA
|x 3
970 _ _ |a VDB:(DE-Juel1)98040
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a ConvertedRecord
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-82)080011_20140620
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)VDB1045
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED
981 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118
981 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)VDB1045
981 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)VDB1047


LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21