% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Schneider:62187,
author = {Schneider, K. and Huisman, J. A. and Breuer, L. and Frede,
H.-G.},
title = {{A}mbiguous effects of grazing intensity on surface soil
moisture: {A} geostatistical case study from a steppe
environment in {I}nner {M}ongolia, {PR} {C}hina},
journal = {Journal of arid environments},
volume = {72},
issn = {0140-1963},
address = {Kidlington},
publisher = {Elsevier},
reportid = {PreJuSER-62187},
pages = {1305 - 1319},
year = {2008},
note = {Record converted from VDB: 12.11.2012},
abstract = {Does grazing intensity lead to changes ill the mechanisms
of water distribution and water storage in the topsoil? We
attempt to answer this question by comparing temporal and
spatial soil moisture variation on sites with different
grazing intensities ranging from ungrazed to heavily grazed.
The research was carried out in it semi-arid steppe
environment in northern China. During file growing season,
evapotranspiration rates usually exceed the amount of
rainfall ill these areas, so the ability to store water in
the plant-soil system is crucial for biomass growth. In June
2005, the spatial variation of soil moisture in five grazing
treatments (two ungrazed sites, one winter grazing, one
continuous grazing and one heavy grazing site) was monitored
on seven consecutive days after a precipitation event. We
used capacitance sensors to measure volumetric soil moisture
down to a depth of 0.06 m. The measurements were analysed
with respect to the spatial correlation of data points
(variogram analysis and kriging interpolation). The five
sites did reveal some spatial patterns, but these were not
very distinct. The capability of retaining water in the
topsoil declined along the grazing gradient from ungrazed
(wettest site) to heavily grazed (driest site). However,
this pattern is disturbed, as the two ungrazed sites
(ungrazed since 1979 and ungrazed since 1999) reacted
differently to wetting and drying and showed significant
differences on all sampling days. (c) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All
rights reserved.},
keywords = {J (WoSType)},
cin = {ICG-4},
ddc = {333.7},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)VDB793},
pnm = {Terrestrische Umwelt},
pid = {G:(DE-Juel1)FUEK407},
shelfmark = {Ecology / Environmental Sciences},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
UT = {WOS:000257043800015},
doi = {10.1016/j.jaridenv.2008.02.002},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/62187},
}