001     62630
005     20180211181625.0
024 7 _ |2 DOI
|a 10.2136/sssaj2007.0185
024 7 _ |2 WOS
|a WOS:000257569500017
037 _ _ |a PreJuSER-62630
041 _ _ |a eng
082 _ _ |a 550
084 _ _ |2 WoS
|a Soil Science
100 1 _ |a Lin, C. P.
|b 0
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
245 _ _ |a Clarification and Calibration of Reflection Coefficient for Electrical Conductivity Measurement by Time Domain Reflectometry
260 _ _ |a Madison, Wis.
|b SSSA
|c 2008
300 _ _ |a 1033 - 1040
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
440 _ 0 |a Soil Science Society of America Journal
|x 0361-5995
|0 8103
|y 4
|v 72
500 _ _ |a Record converted from VDB: 12.11.2012
520 _ _ |a Measurement of electrical conductivity by time domain reflectometry (TDR) requires knowledge of the source step voltage, which is often implicitly accounted for in the measured reflection coefficient. Errors may arise, however, from imperfect amplitude calibration when transforming the voltage signal into the reflection coefficient signal. This instrument error was identified as a considerable source of error in addition to cable resistance for TDR electrical conductivity measurements. The effect of the instrument error due to imperfect amplitude calibration was theoretically examined by the direct current circuit model and experimentally verified. The instrument error resulted in an overestimation of electrical conductivity while the cable resistance led to an underestimation. We clarified that the series resistors model for correction of cable resistance is accurate if the measured reflection coefficient is corrected for the instrument error. A calibration (correction) method for the measured reflection coefficient was proposed to account for both the instrument error and the effect of cable resistance, leading to a simple, accurate, and theoretically sound procedure for TDR electrical conductivity measurements.
536 _ _ |a Terrestrische Umwelt
|c P24
|2 G:(DE-HGF)
|0 G:(DE-Juel1)FUEK407
|x 0
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to Web of Science
650 _ 7 |a J
|2 WoSType
700 1 _ |a Chung, C.
|b 1
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
700 1 _ |a Huisman, J. A.
|b 2
|u FZJ
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)129472
700 1 _ |a Tang, S.
|b 3
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
773 _ _ |a 10.2136/sssaj2007.0185
|g Vol. 72, p. 1033 - 1040
|p 1033 - 1040
|q 72<1033 - 1040
|0 PERI:(DE-600)1481691-x
|t Soil Science Society of America journal
|v 72
|y 2008
|x 0361-5995
856 7 _ |u http://dx.doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2007.0185
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:62630
|p VDB
913 1 _ |k P24
|v Terrestrische Umwelt
|l Terrestrische Umwelt
|b Erde und Umwelt
|0 G:(DE-Juel1)FUEK407
|x 0
914 1 _ |y 2008
915 _ _ |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0010
|a JCR/ISI refereed
920 1 _ |k ICG-4
|l Agrosphäre
|d 31.10.2010
|g ICG
|0 I:(DE-Juel1)VDB793
|x 1
970 _ _ |a VDB:(DE-Juel1)99165
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a ConvertedRecord
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED
981 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118


LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21