% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Hegglin:62633,
author = {Hegglin, M. I. and Boone, C.D. and Manney, G. L. and
Shepherd, T. G. and Walker, K. A. and Bernath, P. F. and
Daffer, W. H. and Hoor, P. and Schiller, C.},
title = {{V}alidation of {ACE}-{FTS} satellite data in the upper
troposphere/lower stratosphere ({UTLS}) using non-coincident
measurements},
journal = {Atmospheric chemistry and physics},
volume = {8},
issn = {1680-7316},
address = {Katlenburg-Lindau},
publisher = {EGU},
reportid = {PreJuSER-62633},
pages = {1483 - 1499},
year = {2008},
note = {Record converted from VDB: 12.11.2012},
abstract = {CO, O-3, and H2O data in the upper troposphere/lower
stratosphere (UTLS) measured by the Atmospheric Chemistry
Experiment Fourier Transform Spectrometer (ACE-FTS) on
Canada's SCISAT-1 satellite are validated using aircraft and
ozonesonde measurements. In the UTLS, validation of chemical
trace gas measurements is a challenging task due to
small-scale variability in the tracer fields, strong
gradients of the tracers across the tropopause, and scarcity
of measurements suitable for validation purposes. Validation
based on coincidences therefore suffers from geophysical
noise. Two alternative methods for the validation of
satellite data are introduced, which avoid the usual need
for coincident measurements: tracer-tracer correlations, and
vertical tracer profiles relative to tropopause height. Both
are increasingly being used for model validation as they
strongly suppress geophysical variability and thereby
provide an 'instantaneous climatology'. This allows
comparison of measurements between non-coincident data sets
which yields information about the precision and a
statistically meaningful error-assessment of the ACE-FTS
satellite data in the UTLS. By defining a trade-off factor,
we show that the measurement errors can be reduced by
including more measurements obtained over a wider longitude
range into the comparison, despite the increased geophysical
variability. Applying the methods then yields the following
upper bounds to the relative differences in the mean found
between the ACE-FTS and SPURT aircraft measurements in the
upper troposphere (UT) and lower stratosphere (LS),
respectively: for CO +/- $9\%$ and +/- $12\%,$ for H2O +/-
$30\%$ and +/- $18\%,$ and for O-3 +/- $25\%$ and +/-
$19\%.$ The relative differences for O-3 can be narrowed
down by using a larger dataset obtained from ozonesondes,
yielding a high bias in the ACE-FTS measurements of $18\%$
in the UT and relative differences of +/- $8\%$ for
measurements in the LS. When taking into account the
smearing effect of the vertically limited spacing between
measurements of the ACE-FTS instrument, the relative
differences decrease by $5-15\%$ around the tropopause,
suggesting a vertical resolution of the ACE-FTS in the UTLS
of around 1 km. The ACE-FTS hence offers unprecedented
precision and vertical resolution for a satellite
instrument, which will allow a new global perspective on
UTLS tracer distributions.},
keywords = {J (WoSType)},
cin = {ICG-1},
ddc = {550},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)VDB790},
pnm = {Atmosphäre und Klima},
pid = {G:(DE-Juel1)FUEK406},
shelfmark = {Meteorology $\&$ Atmospheric Sciences},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
UT = {WOS:000254416700002},
doi = {10.5194/acp-8-1483-2008},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/62633},
}