% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Kstel:7437,
author = {Köstel, J. and Kemna, A. and Javaux, M. and Vanderborght,
J. and Vereecken, H.},
title = {{Q}uantitative imaging of solute transport in an
unsaturated and undisturbed soil monolith with 3-{D} {ERT}
and {TDR}},
journal = {Water resources research},
volume = {44},
number = {12},
issn = {0043-1397},
address = {Washington, DC},
publisher = {AGU},
reportid = {PreJuSER-7437},
pages = {W12411},
year = {2008},
note = {Record converted from VDB: 12.11.2012},
abstract = {Electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) has proved to be a
valuable tool for imaging solute transport processes in the
subsurface. However, a quantitative interpretation of
corresponding ERT results is constrained by a number of
factors. One such factor is the nonuniqueness of the ERT
inverse problem if no additional constraints are imposed. In
the vadose zone, further problems arise from the general
ambiguity of the imaged bulk electrical conductivity in
terms of water content and solute concentration. In this
study we address these issues in detail for a solute tracer
experiment conducted in an undisturbed unsaturated soil
monolith where the tracer transport was monitored by means
of 3-D smoothness-constrained ERT and time domain
reflectometry (TDR) measurements. The experimental design
allowed the determination of solute tracer concentrations
directly from imaged bulk electrical conductivity.
Independent TDR data and effluent tracer concentrations
provided a "ground truth'' for the ERT-derived apparent
convection-dispersion equation transport parameters. The
apparent transport velocity calculated from the ERT results
was consistent with that based on TDR data and the sampled
effluent, independent of the degree of smoothness imposed in
the ERT inversion. On the other hand, the apparent
dispersivity calculated from the ERT results was larger than
that estimated from TDR data but smaller than that estimated
from the sampled effluent, with the magnitude of deviations
dependent on the degree of smoothing. Importantly, no mass
balance problems were observed in the ERT results. We
believe that this is largely a consequence of the uniform
application of the tracer as a front and of the
configuration of the electrode array with respect to the
main transport direction. In conclusion, the study
demonstrates that ERT can yield unprecedented quantitative
information about local- and column-scale solute transport
characteristics in natural soils.},
keywords = {J (WoSType)},
cin = {ICG-4},
ddc = {550},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)VDB793},
pnm = {Terrestrische Umwelt},
pid = {G:(DE-Juel1)FUEK407},
shelfmark = {Environmental Sciences / Limnology / Water Resources},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
UT = {WOS:000261690900003},
doi = {10.1029/2007WR006755},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/7437},
}