% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Zingler:807069,
author = {Zingler, Sebastian and Sommer, Andreas and Sen, Sinan and
Saure, Daniel and Langer, Jochen and Guillon, Olivier and
Lux, Christopher J.},
title = {{E}fficiency of powered systems for interproximal enamel
reduction ({IER}) and enamel roughness before and after
polishing—an in vitro study},
journal = {Clinical oral investigations},
volume = {20},
number = {5},
issn = {1436-3771},
address = {Berlin},
publisher = {Springer},
reportid = {FZJ-2016-02100},
pages = {933-942},
year = {2016},
abstract = {ObjectiveThis aims to evaluate the efficiency of three
different powered interproximal enamel reduction (IER)
systems and to assess enamel roughness before and after
polishing using different polishing times.Material and
methodsFour metal strips of the G5 ProLign Set
(swissdentacare, SDC, Grancia, Switzerland), four segmental
discs of the ASR-Set 4594 and two sonic tips of the
SonicLine Set (both Gebr. Basseler GmbH $\&$ Co. KG, Komet,
Lemgo, Germany) were evaluated. Human extracted incisors
served as the medium. Enamel reduction was determined in
five intervals of 15 s each. Polishing was performed for 15
and 30 s using the manufacturers’ recommended polishing
systems. Enamel roughness (Ra) was quantitatively assessed
by confocal laser scanning microscopy
(CLSM).ResultsSignificant differences in terms of enamel
reduction were found among the working ends of all tested
systems. The time needed to remove 0.1, 0.2 and 0.3 mm of
enamel was determined. Surface analysis showed significantly
higher mean Ra values for nine out of ten working ends
before polishing. This was still the case for five working
ends after 15 s and for two after 30 s of
polishing.ConclusionThe graining and the system used have a
significant influence on enamel reduction. The time needed
for polishing depends on the last working end used; a
polishing time of 30 s is not always appropriate.Clinical
relevanceKnowledge about the cutting efficiency of powered
IER working ends might help the clinician to estimate better
the amount of enamel reduction during the stripping
process.},
cin = {IEK-1 / JARA-ENERGY},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-1-20101013 / $I:(DE-82)080011_20140620$},
pnm = {899 - ohne Topic (POF3-899)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-899},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
UT = {WOS:000376403200006},
doi = {10.1007/s00784-015-1585-2},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/807069},
}