% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Arend:807806,
      author       = {Arend, Isabel and Weiss, Peter H. and Timpert, David C. and
                      Fink, Gereon R. and Henik, Avishai},
      title        = {{S}patial {C}oding as a {F}unction of {H}andedness and
                      {R}esponding {H}and: {T}heoretical and {M}ethodological
                      {I}mplications},
      journal      = {PLoS one},
      volume       = {11},
      number       = {3},
      issn         = {1932-6203},
      address      = {Lawrence, Kan.},
      publisher    = {PLoS},
      reportid     = {FZJ-2016-02199},
      pages        = {e0151979 -},
      year         = {2016},
      abstract     = {The Simon effect shows that choice reactions are faster if
                      the location of the stimulus and the response correspond,
                      even when stimulus location is task-irrelevant. The Simon
                      effect raises the question of what factors influence spatial
                      coding. Until now, the effects of handedness, responding
                      hand, and visual field were addressed in separate studies
                      that used bimanual and unimanual tasks, providing
                      inconclusive results. Here we aimed to close this empirical
                      gap by looking at the effects of these variables in the same
                      study. We used a unimanual version of a Simon task with four
                      groups of participants: left-handed and right-handed,
                      responding with the dominant or nondominant hand. Our
                      results show that the Simon effect is substantially reduced
                      in the field of the responding hand for all groups of
                      participants, except for left-handed individuals responding
                      with the left-hand. These findings highlight the importance
                      of attention mechanisms in stimulus-response coding. They
                      reflect that stimulus-response interference is influenced by
                      hierarchical activation of response units. At a practical
                      level, these findings call for a number of methodological
                      considerations (e.g., handedness, responding hand, and
                      visual field) when using stimulus-response conflict to
                      address spatial coding and cognitive control functions in
                      neurological populations.},
      cin          = {INM-3},
      ddc          = {500},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Juel1)INM-3-20090406},
      pnm          = {572 - (Dys-)function and Plasticity (POF3-572)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-572},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      UT           = {WOS:000373121800026},
      pubmed       = {pmid:27031523},
      doi          = {10.1371/journal.pone.0151979},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/807806},
}